Yale Bulldogs
Model Outputs
2004-2005
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 996 (#208) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1062 (#165) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.7 (#173) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.519 (#179) | - |
2005 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-11-19 | vs | Sacred Heart Pioneers | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2004-11-21 | vs | Syracuse Orange | L | 61 - 65 |
| 2004-11-27 | @ | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 43 - 80 |
| 2004-11-28 | @ | Detroit Mercy Titans | L | 56 - 69 |
| 2004-12-01 | vs | Quinnipiac Bobcats | L | 47 - 68 |
| 2004-12-08 | @ | New Hampshire Wildcats | L | 40 - 54 |
| 2004-12-20 | vs | Morgan State Lady Bears | W | 79 - 70 |
| 2004-12-29 | @ | Lehigh Mountain Hawks | L | 66 - 70 |
| 2004-12-30 | vs | Alabama Crimson Tide | L | 60 - 78 |
| 2005-01-02 | @ | Fairfield Stags | L | 68 - 75 |
| 2005-01-05 | vs | Lafayette Leopards | W | 57 - 43 |
| 2005-01-07 | @ | George Washington Revolutionaries | L | 50 - 90 |
| 2005-01-12 | vs | Delaware State Hornets | W | 46 - 45 |
| 2005-01-15 | vs | Brown Bears | L | 38 - 65 |
| 2005-01-22 | @ | Brown Bears | L | 56 - 72 |
| 2005-01-28 | vs | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 40 - 53 |
| 2005-01-29 | vs | Princeton Tigers | L | 52 - 56 |
| 2005-02-04 | vs | Columbia Lions | L | 58 - 68 |
| 2005-02-05 | vs | Cornell Big Red | W | 68 - 49 |
| 2005-02-11 | @ | Dartmouth Big Green | L | 39 - 59 |
| 2005-02-12 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 55 - 90 |
| 2005-02-18 | @ | Princeton Tigers | L | 49 - 75 |
| 2005-02-19 | @ | Pennsylvania Quakers | W | 74 - 64 |
| 2005-02-25 | vs | Harvard Crimson | L | 30 - 67 |
| 2005-02-26 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | L | 52 - 68 |
| 2005-03-04 | @ | Cornell Big Red | W | 81 - 57 |
| 2005-03-05 | @ | Columbia Lions | L | 57 - 59 |
2005 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Martin
|
- | 2 | 30.5 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 65.1 | 55.6 |
A. Gamboa
|
- | 2 | 29.0 | 13.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 7.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 71.4 | 75.0 | 50.0 | - | 90.7 | 92.9 |
E. Draughan
|
- | 2 | 34.0 | 12.0 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 20.0 | 71.4 | - | 46.0 | 41.3 |
S. Kaplan
|
- | 2 | 31.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 50.0 | 90.0 | - | 58.4 | 40.9 |
C. Hughes
|
- | 2 | 26.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 9.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 40.9 | 39.5 |
M. Kyle
|
- | 1 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
E. Flato
|
- | 2 | 17.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
L. Samplawski
|
NA | 2 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 28.2 | 25.0 |
C. Holmes
|
- | 2 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 45.2 | 0.0 |
N. Holmes
|
- | 2 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG