Wooster
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1061 (#119) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1052 (#174) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -12.4 (#300) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.070 (#651) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.020 (#397) | NetEff -29.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.063 (#580) | AdjNet -23.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.056 (#580) | AdjNet -23.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.204 (#578) | AdjO 56.0 | AdjD 71.0 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Carlow | L | 59 - 64 |
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Thiel | W | 79 - 70 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Franciscan | W | 71 - 64 |
| 2024-11-18 | @ | Waynesburg | L | 55 - 59 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Capital | L | 48 - 75 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Oberlin | L | 52 - 64 |
| 2024-12-06 | vs | Carnegie Mellon | L | 43 - 69 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Miami-Hamilton | L | 64 - 74 |
| 2024-12-17 | @ | Kalamazoo | L | 57 - 65 |
| 2024-12-18 | @ | Alma | L | 52 - 63 |
| 2024-12-30 | vs | Earlham | L | 63 - 71 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Wittenberg | L | 55 - 83 |
| 2025-01-06 | vs | Heidelberg | W | 73 - 64 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Denison | L | 53 - 75 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Hiram | L | 68 - 96 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 38 - 78 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Kenyon | W | 66 - 57 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | DePauw | L | 39 - 92 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Wittenberg | L | 45 - 90 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Oberlin | L | 41 - 63 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Denison | L | 56 - 91 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Hiram | L | 46 - 79 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Ohio Wesleyan | L | 45 - 86 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Kenyon | W | 71 - 60 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | DePauw | L | 39 - 73 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie Riccitelli | - | 25 | 32.5 | 16.6 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 14.8 | 7.7 | -66 | -1.8 | -1.9 | 40.0 | 31.2 | 84.3 | -0.56 | 50.8 | 46.1 |
| Tatiyana Sturdivant | - | 24 | 26.5 | 11.4 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 9.5 | 7.4 | -39 | -1.8 | -2.0 | 42.1 | 38.9 | 78.0 | -0.29 | 53.7 | 49.8 |
| Ella Dean | - | 23 | 26.3 | 6.7 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 2.7 | -94 | -2.8 | -3.2 | 32.2 | 28.6 | 77.5 | -0.65 | 45.9 | 40.9 |
| Ella Biondi | - | 25 | 17.5 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 5.4 | 7.3 | -26 | -0.7 | -1.1 | 49.6 | 0 | 44.9 | 0.28 | 49.8 | 49.6 |
| Ellery Kloek | - | 20 | 15.3 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 3.8 | 0.9 | -39 | -1.4 | -3.0 | 39.5 | 33.3 | 68.4 | -0.44 | 47.4 | 44.1 |
| Erica Beaty | - | 25 | 22.0 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 3.2 | -57 | -2.3 | -3.3 | 31.8 | 27.3 | 50.0 | -0.33 | 39.2 | 37.1 |
| Emily Webb | - | 22 | 24.1 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 1.2 | -60 | -1.9 | -2.8 | 25.8 | 14.8 | 68.8 | -0.5 | 31.2 | 27.8 |
| Anna Hardink | - | 21 | 15.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.5 | -63 | -3.5 | -5.5 | 37.0 | 0.0 | 63.2 | -0.44 | 42.3 | 37.0 |
| Lynx Lander | - | 25 | 14.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.0 | -0.0 | -10 | -0.3 | -0.8 | 20.0 | 8.3 | 35.0 | -0.09 | 23.3 | 21.3 |
| Chloe Pordash | - | 24 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.5 | -0.1 | -37 | -2.1 | -13.4 | 29.7 | 25.9 | 100.0 | -0.53 | 42.6 | 39.2 |
| Kylie Parsons | - | 25 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | -10 | -0.5 | -2.9 | 53.8 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.07 | 54.3 | 53.8 |
| Katelyn Barnes | - | 24 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | -2 | -0.1 | -1.2 | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.06 | 50.7 | 50.0 |
| Alexis Lovejoy | - | 11 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG