๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Wofford

2026-2027 Team Stats (5 games)

66.4
PPG
70.2
Opp
-3.8
Margin
35.8%
FG%
31.5%
3P%
73.0%
FT%
43.0
RPG
12.4
APG
17.8
TO
73.8
Est. poss./game
58.5
Adj PPG
59.6
Adj Opp PPG
#164
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 1013 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1020, returning +38, transfers -44, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 1029 (#147) Preseason prior 1013 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1020, returning +38, transfers -44, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 1016 (#147) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 1016 (#146) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -2.6 (#184) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ -2.5 (#184) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.306 (#203) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -6.4 More โ†’ 0.432 (#184) AdjNet -6.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -5.9 More โ†’ 0.441 (#181) AdjNet -5.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 58.5 | AdjD 59.6 More โ†’ 0.493 (#164) AdjO 58.5 | AdjD 59.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 58.5 | AdjD 59.6 More โ†’ 0.494 (#164) AdjO 58.5 | AdjD 59.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.479 (#170) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.480 (#170) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 195 | GP 2 More โ†’ 1002 (#153) RD 195 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.488 (#163) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ NC State Wolfpack L 50 - 80
2026-11-05 vs King (TN) Tornado W 78 - 60
2026-11-08 @ Georgia State Panthers W 64 - 60
2026-11-10 vs North Greenville Trailblazers W 64 - 42
2026-11-14 @ Georgia Southern Eagles L 76 - 109
2026-11-18 @ Charlotte 49ers - Preview
2026-11-21 vs Presbyterian Blue Hose - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Maddie Heiss Maddie Heiss G 5 29.4 14.0 3.8 1.6 0.2 0.0 2.0 11.0 6.6 19 4 4.8 6.5 36.4 45.2 76.2 0.85 54.5 49.1
Gabby Mundy Gabby Mundy G 3 23.0 12.7 3.3 2.0 1.3 0.0 2.0 12.0 5.3 5 3 1.7 2.9 36.1 28.6 66.7 1.13 46.0 41.7
Mearah Whitehead Mearah Whitehead G 5 26.0 11.8 4.2 2.0 1.0 0.6 4.0 9.8 5.8 33 4 8.2 11.5 40.8 35.7 70.0 2.32 51.0 45.9
Angelina Pelayo Angelina Pelayo C 5 19.6 7.8 4.4 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 6.2 7.6 42 4 10.5 24.9 48.4 100.0 66.7 2.27 53.7 50.0
Molly Masingale Molly Masingale G 5 33.6 6.6 3.6 2.6 1.0 0.0 2.8 8.2 2.8 0 4 0.0 0.0 24.4 27.3 77.8 -1.88 36.7 31.7
Emmanuelle Broude Emmanuelle Broude F 5 14.4 4.6 5.4 0.6 0.6 0.2 2.4 5.4 3.6 -41 4 -10.2 -32.9 29.6 25.0 85.7 -5.14 38.2 31.5
Elli Porter Elli Porter G 3 19.3 4.3 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.7 5.0 0.3 13 3 4.3 9.1 20.0 23.1 100.0 -0.41 38.8 30.0
Courtney Swider Courtney Swider F 5 18.8 3.8 5.4 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.0 3.2 7.0 -8 4 -2.0 -4.3 50.0 14.3 50.0 -2.84 53.5 53.1
Aleksandra Noworol Aleksandra Noworol F 4 6.5 3.2 1.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.2 2.5 2.8 2 3 0.7 4.9 50.0 0 100.0 -0.33 57.4 50.0
Sienna Wolfe Sienna Wolfe G 5 10.6 3.2 2.0 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 3.0 2.6 10 4 2.5 9.0 40.0 25.0 50.0 0.07 50.4 50.0
Sayler Lowe Sayler Lowe F 1 24.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 0.0 -14 1 -14.0 -23.1 20.0 0.0 0 -0.71 20.0 20.0
Abby Eller Abby Eller G 4 12.8 1.8 3.5 1.2 0.0 0.2 1.5 1.8 3.5 4 3 1.3 5.0 14.3 33.3 66.7 -0.82 36.3 21.4
Sara Deidda Sara Deidda G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

306 located field-goal attempts in 5 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Whitehead33% Pelayo26% Masingale67% Broude50% Heiss50% Heiss50% Heiss50% Heiss47% Mundy33% Whitehead40%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Broude37% Masingale20% Whitehead36% Heiss30% Heiss39% Swider20% Swider100% Porter18% Heiss43% Masingale27%
Misses: who misses most here

Maddie HeissMearah WhiteheadAngelina PelayoGabby MundyMolly MasingaleCourtney SwiderEmmanuelle BroudeElli Porter

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 27-46 58.7 54 Mearah Whitehead 33% (18 pts) Gabby Mundy 19% (10 pts) Emmanuelle Broude 37% (7 misses) Gabby Mundy 16% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 35-89 39.3 70 Angelina Pelayo 26% (18 pts) Mearah Whitehead 17% (12 pts) Molly Masingale 20% (11 misses) Angelina Pelayo 17% (9 misses)
Mid-range left 3-14 21.4 6 Molly Masingale 67% (4 pts) Sayler Lowe 33% (2 pts) Mearah Whitehead 36% (4 misses) Emmanuelle Broude 18% (2 misses)
Mid-range center 2-12 16.7 4 Emmanuelle Broude 50% (2 pts) Sienna Wolfe 50% (2 pts) Maddie Heiss 30% (3 misses) Angelina Pelayo 20% (2 misses)
Mid-range right 4-22 18.2 8 Maddie Heiss 50% (4 pts) Angelina Pelayo 25% (2 pts) Maddie Heiss 39% (7 misses) Angelina Pelayo 22% (4 misses)
Left corner 3 6-16 37.5 18 Maddie Heiss 50% (9 pts) Elli Porter 17% (3 pts) Courtney Swider 20% (2 misses) Mearah Whitehead 20% (2 misses)
Right corner 3 2-3 66.7 6 Maddie Heiss 50% (3 pts) Mearah Whitehead 50% (3 pts) Courtney Swider 100% (1 misses) -
Above-break 3 left 15-37 40.5 45 Maddie Heiss 47% (21 pts) Gabby Mundy 13% (6 pts) Elli Porter 18% (4 misses) Gabby Mundy 18% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 center 6-20 30.0 18 Gabby Mundy 33% (6 pts) Molly Masingale 33% (6 pts) Maddie Heiss 43% (6 misses) Gabby Mundy 14% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 10-47 21.3 30 Mearah Whitehead 40% (12 pts) Maddie Heiss 20% (6 pts) Molly Masingale 27% (10 misses) Sienna Wolfe 16% (6 misses)