Wisconsin
2020 Team Stats (10 games)
62.3
PPG
61.2
Opp
+1.3
Margin
41.1%
FG%
31.9%
3P%
72.0%
FT%
33.6
RPG
10.0
APG
9.4
TO
70.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1575 (#21) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1461 (#35) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +38.0 (#26) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.576 (#30) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.602 (#24) | NetEff +3.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.810 (#17) | AdjNet +12.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.811 (#17) | AdjNet +12.6 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | vs | Saint Mary's Gaels | L | 63 - 65 |
| 2019-12-11 | @ | Rutgers Scarlet Knights | L | 65 - 72 |
| 2020-01-03 | @ | Ohio State Buckeyes | W | 61 - 57 |
| 2020-01-11 | @ | Penn State Nittany Lions | W | 58 - 49 |
| 2020-01-14 | vs | Maryland Terrapins | W | 56 - 54 |
| 2020-01-17 | @ | Michigan State Spartans | L | 55 - 67 |
| 2020-01-27 | @ | Iowa Hawkeyes | L | 62 - 68 |
| 2020-02-01 | vs | Michigan State Spartans | W | 64 - 63 |
| 2020-02-27 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | W | 81 - 74 |
| 2020-03-04 | vs | Northwestern Wildcats | W | 63 - 48 |
| 2020-03-07 | @ | Indiana Hoosiers | W | 60 - 56 |
| 2020-03-13 | vs | TBD | - | Preview |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Reuvers
|
F | 11 | 27.1 | 13.0 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 10.2 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 37.9 | 75.7 | - | 55.7 | 48.7 |
Micah Potter
|
- | 9 | 19.3 | 11.1 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 7.9 | 8.9 | - | - | - | 54.9 | 40.7 | 78.6 | - | 64.8 | 62.7 |
K. King
|
- | 6 | 29.3 | 10.8 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 6.3 | 7.2 | 18 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 57.1 | 0.29 | 73.6 | 51.3 |
B. Davison
|
G | 10 | 33.1 | 9.1 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.6 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 34.2 | 25.0 | 76.9 | - | 52.0 | 40.8 |
D. Trice
|
G | 11 | 31.5 | 8.8 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 8.2 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 35.6 | 34.9 | 72.7 | - | 48.7 | 43.9 |
A. Ford
|
- | 11 | 23.5 | 7.4 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 5.5 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 42.6 | 32.4 | 81.8 | -0.09 | 61.5 | 51.6 |
B. Pritzl
|
G | 11 | 28.0 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 5.4 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 30.5 | 31.4 | 75.0 | - | 46.1 | 39.8 |
T. Anderson
|
G | 11 | 13.3 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 68 | 6.8 | 12.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.51 | 85.2 | 53.1 |
Tyler Wahl
|
- | 11 | 16.6 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 3.1 | - | - | - | 32.3 | 9.1 | 0.0 | - | 38.7 | 33.9 |
M. Ballard
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
W. McGrory
|
G | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Hedstrom
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG