Wilkes
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 971 (#317) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 995 (#271) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +2.2 (#95) | HCA +2.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.742 (#324) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.789 (#133) | NetEff +12.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.599 (#318) | AdjNet +3.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.590 (#318) | AdjNet +3.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.542 (#326) | AdjO 73.7 | AdjD 71.9 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Wash. & Lee | W | 63 - 50 |
| 2024-11-09 | @ | Ursinus | W | 100 - 99 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Keystone | W | 92 - 82 |
| 2024-11-20 | @ | Scranton | W | 58 - 48 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Catholic | L | 72 - 78 |
| 2024-11-26 | @ | Marywood | W | 79 - 67 |
| 2024-11-30 | vs | Keystone | W | 90 - 67 |
| 2024-12-04 | vs | Lycoming | W | 87 - 64 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Juniata | W | 65 - 45 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | King's (PA) | L | 90 - 94 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Muhlenberg | W | 75 - 69 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Goucher | W | 78 - 61 |
| 2025-01-12 | @ | Elizabethtown | W | 82 - 74 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Drew | L | 82 - 84 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Susquehanna | L | 64 - 67 |
| 2025-01-22 | vs | Moravian | W | 91 - 66 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Catholic | L | 64 - 94 |
| 2025-01-29 | @ | Lycoming | W | 86 - 72 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Juniata | W | 65 - 54 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Scranton | W | 71 - 58 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Susquehanna | W | 87 - 81 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Drew | L | 92 - 102 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Elizabethtown | W | 87 - 57 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Moravian | W | 85 - 63 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Goucher | W | 85 - 68 |
| 2025-02-25 | vs | Scranton | W | 59 - 43 |
| 2025-02-27 | @ | Catholic | L | 76 - 96 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Lesko | - | 27 | 33.6 | 20.5 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 15.7 | 14.8 | 68 | 3.2 | 8.2 | 48.2 | 34.6 | 72.8 | 2.19 | 57.3 | 53.7 |
| Cayden Merrifield | - | 25 | 32.4 | 15.5 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 11.0 | 11.2 | 64 | 4.6 | 7.9 | 45.5 | 40.9 | 66.4 | 2.4 | 59.5 | 56.5 |
| Jack Argento | - | 27 | 29.9 | 10.7 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 94 | 4.1 | 13.0 | 48.7 | 24.2 | 65.7 | 1.91 | 54.8 | 52.1 |
| Eli Becker | - | 23 | 23.9 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 7.0 | 9.3 | 65 | 3.6 | 11.1 | 59.6 | 41.9 | 74.3 | 1.23 | 65.5 | 63.7 |
| Daniel Santaniello | - | 27 | 16.2 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 62 | 4.1 | 22.6 | 40.0 | 31.8 | 81.5 | 0.67 | 55.0 | 48.1 |
| Colin Ackerman | - | 25 | 18.6 | 5.9 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 6.0 | 37 | 2.2 | 12.5 | 47.3 | 38.6 | 65.9 | 0.41 | 57.8 | 55.0 |
| Joey Zvorsky | - | 25 | 26.8 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 9.4 | 19 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 51.9 | 30.6 | 80.6 | 1.08 | 61.7 | 57.2 |
| Mason Fedor | - | 27 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 12 | 0.9 | 8.9 | 41.7 | 22.2 | 64.3 | -0.01 | 47.1 | 43.8 |
| Issac Thomas | - | 27 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 6 | 0.5 | 40.4 | 45.2 | 0.0 | 69.2 | -0.8 | 50.4 | 45.2 |
| Matt Ward | - | 26 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 18 | 4.5 | 98.4 | 23.1 | 20.0 | 70.0 | -0.71 | 34.6 | 29.5 |
| Brian Britton | - | 25 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | -14 | -1.6 | -48.5 | 53.3 | 28.6 | 100.0 | -0.54 | 64.3 | 60.0 |
| Travis Linn | - | 25 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | -2 | -0.7 | -7.2 | 30.8 | 25.0 | 75.0 | -0.55 | 40.7 | 34.6 |
| Brendan Styer | - | 25 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -40 | -3.6 | -162.7 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 22.2 | -0.59 | 30.9 | 33.3 |
| Drew Sechleer | - | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG