Wichita State Shockers
2020 Team Stats (2 games)
81.5
PPG
67.0
Opp
-2.6
Margin
44.7%
FG%
30.0%
3P%
71.9%
FT%
42.0
RPG
12.5
APG
16.5
TO
90.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1183 (#177) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1321 (#104) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +29.3 (#101) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.228 (#77) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.974 (#1) | NetEff +29.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.475 (#66) | AdjNet -0.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.471 (#66) | AdjNet -1.0 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 75 - 69 |
| 2020-01-04 | vs | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 74 - 54 |
| 2020-01-09 | vs | Memphis Tigers | W | 76 - 67 |
| 2020-01-12 | @ | UConn Huskies | W | 89 - 86 |
| 2020-01-15 | @ | Temple Owls | L | 53 - 65 |
| 2020-01-18 | vs | Houston Cougars | L | 54 - 65 |
| 2020-02-01 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 51 - 54 |
| 2020-02-09 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 43 - 76 |
| 2020-03-13 | vs | TBD | - | Preview |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Burton
|
- | 8 | 30.6 | 11.9 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 14.6 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 25.0 | 66.7 | - | 408.1 | 27.8 |
E. Stevenson
|
- | 8 | 25.2 | 11.5 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 10.0 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 36.2 | 30.6 | 76.0 | - | 50.5 | 45.6 |
J. Echenique
|
C | 8 | 23.8 | 11.4 | 6.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 8.6 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 50.7 | 12.5 | 80.0 | - | 56.9 | 51.4 |
T. Etienne
|
- | 8 | 27.9 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 7.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 23.2 | 26.3 | 84.0 | - | 42.5 | 32.1 |
G. Sherfield
|
- | 8 | 28.5 | 6.9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 26.6 | 17.4 | 70.8 | - | 36.9 | 29.7 |
D. Dennis
|
- | 7 | 24.7 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 3.6 | -41 | -3.7 | -7.4 | 25.0 | 25.8 | 84.6 | -0.71 | 38.1 | 32.1 |
T. Wade
|
F | 8 | 23.4 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 6.1 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 34.7 | 17.6 | 45.0 | - | 39.8 | 37.8 |
M. Udeze
|
- | 8 | 12.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 38.1 | - | 47.5 | 50.0 |
I. Poor Bear-Chandler
|
- | 4 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Fernandes, Noah
|
- | 5 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
A. Midtgaard
|
C | 6 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 34.7 | 50.0 |
D. Gordon
|
F | 5 | 4.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | -0.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG