🐻⬇️🏀

Whittier Poets

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2013 2010
Also known as: Whittier Poets
Program History

2025 Team Stats (1 games)

66.0
PPG
100.0
Opp
-34.0
Margin
35.5%
FG%
20.0%
3P%
77.3%
FT%
25.0
RPG
7.0
APG
8.0
TO
79.7
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +109 elo More → 992 (#480) HCA +109 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.5 More → -21.0 (#613) HCA +2.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 71.9 | AdjD 76.5 More → 0.396 (#621) AdjO 71.9 | AdjD 76.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.201 (#572) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.241 (#572) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 2 More → 845 (#621) RD 350 | GP 2

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2024-12-16 @ Utah Tech Trailblazers L 66 - 100

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Smith A. Smith - 1 34.0 31.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 22.0 11.0 46 1.7 2.4 40.9 30.0 100.0 0.78 58.7 47.7
A. Milot A. Milot ATH 1 25.0 12.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 5.0 - - - 55.6 0.0 50.0 - 55.8 55.6
R. Kalu R. Kalu - 1 17.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 9.0 -2.0 - - - 33.3 0.0 75.0 - 41.8 33.3
C. Nwanevu C. Nwanevu - 1 24.0 4.0 7.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 9.0 - - - 40.0 0.0 0 - 40.0 40.0
I. Bettinelli I. Bettinelli - 1 16.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 - - - 25.0 33.3 0 - 37.5 37.5
T. Watters T. Watters - 1 28.0 3.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 3.0 12.0 - - - 33.3 0 50.0 - 38.7 33.3
J. Mathis J. Mathis - 1 17.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 9.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 0 - 150.0 150.0
M. Cox M. Cox F 1 23.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 50.0 - 8.5 0.0
J. Hose-Shea J. Hose-Shea ATH 1 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 0.0 0.0
D. Mims D. Mims - 1 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
V. Andrea V. Andrea ATH 1 8.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG