West Liberty
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 806 (#507) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 853 (#480) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 847 (#656) | HCA +75 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -8.0 (#238) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -10.6 (#520) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.266 (#453) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.282 (#337) | NetEff -7.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.270 (#481) | AdjNet -8.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.270 (#481) | AdjNet -8.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.366 (#491) | AdjO 70.7 | AdjD 76.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.280 (#619) | AdjO 64.1 | AdjD 74.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.252 (#562) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.248 (#571) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 783 (#478) | RD 98 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-11 | @ | Duquesne | L | 73 - 102 |
| 2025-11-14 | vs | Edinboro | W | 88 - 72 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | California (PA) | L | 69 - 77 |
| 2025-11-19 | @ | Ursuline | W | 87 - 81 |
| 2025-11-22 | @ | Pitt.-Johnstown | L | 75 - 97 |
| 2025-11-25 | @ | Seton Hill | L | 68 - 93 |
| 2025-12-03 | vs | Salem (WV) | W | 71 - 50 |
| 2025-12-06 | vs | Point Park | W | 77 - 61 |
| 2025-12-17 | vs | West Va. Wesleyan | L | 71 - 80 |
| 2025-12-20 | vs | Tiffin | L | 67 - 80 |
| 2026-01-03 | @ | Davis & Elkins | W | 84 - 80 |
| 2026-01-10 | @ | Fairmont St. | L | 54 - 76 |
| 2026-01-14 | vs | Glenville St. | L | 89 - 100 |
| 2026-01-17 | @ | Concord | L | 77 - 93 |
| 2026-01-19 | vs | West Virginia St. | L | 74 - 77 |
| 2026-01-21 | @ | Point Park | L | 68 - 73 |
| 2026-01-24 | vs | Wheeling | L | 52 - 78 |
| 2026-01-28 | @ | West Virginia St. | W | 74 - 61 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | Charleston (WV) | L | 65 - 79 |
| 2026-02-04 | vs | Davis & Elkins | W | 66 - 61 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | West Va. Wesleyan | L | 68 - 88 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bailee Smith | - | 4 | 29.5 | 24.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 18.5 | 9.0 | -9 | -3.0 | -4.8 | 45.9 | 38.5 | 72.2 | 1.55 | 58.6 | 56.1 |
| Reagan Vinskovich | - | 10 | 24.7 | 17.6 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 13.5 | 12.6 | -17 | -1.7 | -5.4 | 51.9 | 0 | 67.9 | 2.18 | 55.6 | 51.9 |
| Abbie Davidson | - | 1 | 29.2 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 50.0 | 80.0 | - | 64.4 | 59.1 |
| Anna Lucarelli | - | 21 | 32.6 | 14.6 | 6.6 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 4.3 | 11.8 | 11.3 | -54 | -2.5 | -9.9 | 39.3 | 28.8 | 60.9 | 2.02 | 48.3 | 42.3 |
| Olivia Baker | - | 13 | 30.2 | 14.1 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 11.1 | 6.8 | -54 | -3.6 | -17.8 | 39.6 | 38.1 | 81.8 | -0.13 | 59.5 | 57.3 |
| Ana-Isabel Andersson Rodriguez | - | 18 | 31.0 | 9.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 4.3 | 9.2 | 5.6 | -93 | -4.9 | -35.5 | 36.7 | 28.4 | 65.7 | -0.49 | 45.2 | 42.5 |
| Jameka Brungard | - | 21 | 17.1 | 8.5 | 5.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 6.4 | 7.7 | -41 | -1.9 | -21.8 | 55.6 | 16.7 | 56.2 | 0.42 | 57.0 | 55.9 |
| Halley Smith | - | 11 | 24.1 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 2.5 | -35 | -3.2 | -65.9 | 36.6 | 19.0 | 89.7 | 0.42 | 48.9 | 39.4 |
| Katie Lucarelli | - | 21 | 30.5 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 4.8 | 5.5 | -36 | -1.6 | -6.8 | 40.6 | 27.1 | 58.6 | -0.32 | 49.2 | 47.0 |
| Dria Parker | - | 21 | 22.7 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 5.7 | 2.8 | -41 | -1.9 | -9.9 | 29.2 | 27.7 | 76.9 | -0.22 | 44.1 | 42.1 |
| Kaleigh Norris | - | 21 | 16.5 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 3.1 | -45 | -2.0 | -14.9 | 34.4 | 25.0 | 50.0 | -2.35 | 43.6 | 41.4 |
| Jillian Huffman | - | 12 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 42.1 | 0.0 | 60.0 | -1.27 | 47.0 | 42.1 |
| Ella Giles | - | 10 | 4.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | -6 | -0.5 | -25.3 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -1.01 | 22.5 | 12.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG