🐻⬇️🏀

Wesleyan (GA)

Also known as: Wesleyan (GA)
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 853 (#454) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 633 (#597) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +62 elo More → 795 (#696) HCA +62 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → -33.4 (#402) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More → -21.2 (#616) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.002 (#735) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +122.4 More → 1.000 (#1) NetEff +122.4
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -40.1 More → 0.002 (#575) NetEff -40.1
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -58.7 More → 0.001 (#722) AdjNet -58.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -59.4 More → 0.001 (#722) AdjNet -59.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 39.5 | AdjD 77.0 More → 0.032 (#720) AdjO 39.5 | AdjD 77.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 48.9 | AdjD 67.1 More → 0.160 (#683) AdjO 48.9 | AdjD 67.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.112 (#654) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.116 (#658) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 160 | GP 6 More → 663 (#554) RD 160 | GP 6

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-01-24 vs Covenant L 38 - 66
2026-01-24 @ Trinity (CT) L 45 - 65
2026-01-27 vs Huntingdon L 43 - 61
2026-01-30 vs Tufts L 57 - 74
2026-01-31 vs Connecticut Col. L 55 - 70
2026-02-03 vs LaGrange L 52 - 77
2026-02-08 @ Bates L 0 - 0

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Meghan Kirck - 4 32.4 16.5 1.2 1.8 1.8 0.2 2.5 15.0 4.0 - - - 41.7 40.0 0 - 55.0 55.0
Olivia Quinn - 4 35.5 15.5 3.8 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 14.8 5.5 - - - 35.6 21.1 84.2 - 46.0 39.0
Zariah Davis - 3 35.8 11.7 8.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 3.0 12.7 5.7 -175 -11.7 -64.3 34.2 30.8 50.0 -3.0 41.3 39.5
Mar'Reonna Little - 3 19.4 8.7 4.3 0.3 2.0 0.0 4.3 9.3 1.7 -165 -11.8 -84.0 28.6 25.0 50.0 -0.26 38.1 33.9
Alli Jones - 4 30.4 8.5 7.5 0.8 1.8 0.8 1.0 11.0 7.2 38 2.2 55.2 27.3 25.0 60.0 0.46 33.6 28.4
Jenaiya Hardy - 3 27.7 8.0 6.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 3.7 8.3 5.3 -35 -5.0 -26.8 40.0 33.3 42.9 -0.34 42.7 42.0
Alissa Sandifer - 3 28.5 6.7 3.7 2.7 1.7 0.3 6.3 10.0 -1.3 -78 -6.0 -51.6 20.0 0.0 80.0 -3.02 29.1 20.0
Ali Murphy - 4 28.5 6.0 5.5 1.8 0.5 0.5 0.8 6.5 7.0 -55 -3.4 -40.3 38.5 0 50.0 -1.19 40.7 38.5
Maya Whitehead - 3 29.3 4.7 4.3 2.0 1.3 0.0 3.7 9.3 -0.7 -129 -9.2 -72.9 21.4 16.7 33.3 -4.73 23.9 23.2
Kiara Hayes - 3 23.4 2.7 4.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 2.7 3.0 -135 -9.6 -96.2 50.0 0 0 -2.57 50.0 50.0
Samaya Lovett - 4 17.2 2.5 3.2 1.2 1.0 0.0 0.8 4.2 3.0 - - - 23.5 0.0 40.0 - 26.0 23.5
Brooke Adams - 2 1.9 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.5 - - - 100.0 100.0 0 - 125.0 125.0
Madie Dayton - 4 28.2 2.2 2.8 2.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 3.0 4.2 - - - 25.0 25.0 50.0 - 34.9 33.3
Katie Laufer - 3 8.1 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 3.3 -1.7 -78 -7.1 -82.6 10.0 11.1 0 -0.93 15.0 15.0
Briscia Tejada - 3 22.2 1.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.7 3.7 -106 -8.2 -49.6 20.0 0 50.0 -1.68 25.5 20.0
Delaney Beighley - 2 1.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 53.2 0.0
Abigail Goff - 3 8.4 0.7 2.7 0.0 0.7 0.3 1.3 2.0 1.0 - - - 16.7 0.0 0 - 16.7 16.7
Aviva Schnitzer - 4 4.9 0.5 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.5 - - - 16.7 0.0 0 - 16.7 16.7
Kaylin Genda - 4 13.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.5 2.0 0.2 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 11.3 0.0
Idrianna Edwards - 3 5.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.3 -100 -7.1 -83.0 0 0 0 -2.96 0 0
Pauline Vlahakis - 1 1.8 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Molly Brown - 2 1.6 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -58 -2.1 -26.6 0 0 0 0.75 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG