Wesleyan (CT)
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1090 (#66) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1163 (#35) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +16.0 (#8) | HCA +2.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.881 (#250) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.934 (#84) | NetEff +23.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.894 (#186) | AdjNet +18.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.895 (#185) | AdjNet +18.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.760 (#193) | AdjO 80.0 | AdjD 67.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Rutgers-Newark | W | 71 - 53 |
| 2024-11-20 | @ | Montclair St. | W | 70 - 67 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | Anna Maria | W | 87 - 56 |
| 2024-11-23 | vs | Albertus Magnus | W | 81 - 63 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Emmanuel (MA) | W | 82 - 59 |
| 2024-11-30 | vs | Farmingdale St. | W | 77 - 62 |
| 2024-12-03 | @ | Worcester St. | W | 78 - 49 |
| 2024-12-05 | @ | Lasell | W | 93 - 57 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Williams | W | 57 - 45 |
| 2024-12-19 | @ | Wentworth | W | 83 - 62 |
| 2024-12-20 | vs | Widener | W | 94 - 65 |
| 2024-12-30 | @ | Yeshiva | W | 72 - 55 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Amherst | W | 82 - 69 |
| 2025-01-06 | @ | Bridgewater St. | W | 90 - 46 |
| 2025-01-10 | vs | Williams | W | 67 - 61 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Middlebury | W | 89 - 63 |
| 2025-01-17 | @ | Hamilton | W | 73 - 57 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Amherst | W | 72 - 60 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Trinity (CT) | W | 72 - 63 |
| 2025-01-31 | vs | Tufts | W | 69 - 66 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Connecticut Col. | W | 74 - 54 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Bates | W | 73 - 67 |
| 2025-02-14 | @ | Bowdoin | W | 84 - 73 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Colby | W | 91 - 64 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Amherst | W | 65 - 58 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Hamilton | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2025-03-02 | vs | Trinity (CT) | L | 67 - 75 |
| 2025-03-07 | vs | Delaware Valley | W | 72 - 50 |
| 2025-03-08 | vs | Gettysburg | W | 82 - 60 |
| 2025-03-14 | vs | WPI | W | 66 - 50 |
| 2025-03-15 | vs | Emory | W | 61 - 58 |
| 2025-03-20 | vs | Trinity (CT) | L | 69 - 73 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shane Regan | - | 32 | 28.7 | 17.5 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 12.5 | 12.1 | - | - | - | - | 50.6 | 29.8 | 85.9 | - | 60.3 | 54.5 |
| Nicky Johnson | - | 26 | 30.9 | 13.4 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 10.7 | 11.8 | - | - | - | - | 44.4 | 37.9 | 77.5 | - | 55.5 | 51.4 |
| Ben Lyttle | - | 32 | 21.0 | 8.2 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 8.3 | - | - | - | - | 41.5 | 35.6 | 67.7 | - | 52.5 | 49.6 |
| Jackson Cormier | - | 25 | 23.2 | 7.9 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 5.9 | 8.8 | - | - | - | - | 52.4 | 27.7 | 70.5 | - | 59.5 | 56.8 |
| Fritz Hauser | - | 32 | 23.0 | 6.3 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 6.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | - | 37.5 | 23.8 | 64.7 | - | 45.5 | 43.5 |
| Oscar Edelman | - | 32 | 14.1 | 6.1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 4.7 | - | - | - | - | 40.4 | 37.2 | 62.5 | - | 54.4 | 53.0 |
| Sam Pohlman | - | 26 | 17.2 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 5.7 | - | - | - | - | 44.8 | 18.8 | 84.8 | - | 54.0 | 47.2 |
| Zach Wolinski | - | 32 | 13.8 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 3.6 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 35.3 | 32.3 | 72.7 | - | 50.9 | 48.3 |
| Josh Cameron | - | 26 | 17.2 | 2.9 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 6.4 | - | - | - | - | 38.4 | 16.7 | 52.9 | - | 43.2 | 39.7 |
| Jared Langs | - | 29 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | 65.0 | 50.0 | 75.0 | - | 71.2 | 70.0 |
| Hunter Fleming | - | 28 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 56.8 | 52.3 |
| Philip Park | - | 25 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 41.7 | 36.4 | 50.0 | - | 58.2 | 58.3 |
| Alex Justh | - | 28 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | 45.5 | 20.0 | 33.3 | - | 48.7 | 50.0 |
| Charlie Moore | - | 27 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 28.6 | 0 | - | 41.7 | 41.7 |
| Jacob Pofsky | - | 28 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | - | - | - | - | 23.5 | 22.2 | 50.0 | - | 30.8 | 29.4 |
| Dom Obukwelu | - | 21 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 100.0 | 75.0 | - | 79.8 | 75.0 |
| Jack Williamson | - | 24 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | - | 56.3 | 62.5 |
| Anthony Aririguzoh | - | 25 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 42.9 | 42.9 |
| Michael Astorino | - | 24 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Reid Celestin | - | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG