Wentworth
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 838 (#461) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 789 (#456) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -32.6 (#398) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.016 (#703) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.030 (#388) | NetEff -24.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.001 (#714) | AdjNet -55.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.001 (#713) | AdjNet -56.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.049 (#705) | AdjO 40.6 | AdjD 73.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Fitchburg St. | L | 64 - 77 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Mount Holyoke | W | 57 - 49 |
| 2024-11-18 | vs | Elms | L | 58 - 68 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Dean | L | 66 - 71 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Lesley | W | 59 - 52 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Roger Williams | L | 39 - 73 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Western New Eng. | L | 37 - 73 |
| 2024-12-11 | @ | Hartford | L | 45 - 62 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | JWU (Providence) | L | 57 - 86 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | Wellesley | L | 52 - 62 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Endicott | L | 51 - 75 |
| 2025-01-07 | vs | Curry | L | 47 - 63 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Gordon | L | 49 - 72 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Nichols | L | 68 - 81 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Suffolk | L | 43 - 66 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | U New England | L | 45 - 76 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Western New Eng. | L | 46 - 78 |
| 2025-01-28 | vs | Roger Williams | L | 27 - 57 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Endicott | L | 41 - 68 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Curry | L | 60 - 72 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Hartford | L | 46 - 60 |
| 2025-02-11 | vs | U New England | L | 38 - 76 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Suffolk | L | 44 - 65 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Nichols | L | 51 - 93 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Gordon | L | 65 - 73 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddy Foster | - | 25 | 26.2 | 11.2 | 6.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 3.8 | 10.7 | 5.9 | -99 | -5.0 | -5.8 | 38.6 | 32.9 | 57.3 | -0.23 | 45.7 | 42.9 |
| Taylor Garabedian | - | 25 | 30.9 | 11.0 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 10.2 | 8.5 | -17 | -0.6 | -0.6 | 39.1 | 20.9 | 66.7 | -0.81 | 45.9 | 40.8 |
| Gabby Amoddio | - | 25 | 30.5 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 6.4 | 5.5 | -113 | -5.7 | -6.1 | 38.4 | 32.7 | 81.2 | -0.42 | 51.5 | 43.7 |
| Brianna Carroll | - | 24 | 26.7 | 7.0 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 8.4 | 2.6 | -104 | -5.8 | -7.4 | 27.7 | 25.6 | 62.5 | -0.58 | 39.5 | 37.9 |
| Samantha Jones | - | 16 | 22.6 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 6.1 | 1.5 | -57 | -5.7 | -7.6 | 24.5 | 12.5 | 73.7 | -0.26 | 30.6 | 26.0 |
| Reagan Madonia | - | 16 | 13.0 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 31.2 | 60.0 | -0.13 | 44.0 | 42.4 |
| Brooke Carlson | - | 25 | 19.7 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 0.5 | -106 | -5.3 | -7.6 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 68.2 | -0.51 | 40.1 | 36.1 |
| Tita Rana | - | 23 | 17.5 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 0.8 | -32 | -1.1 | -1.5 | 25.8 | 20.0 | 58.8 | -1.02 | 34.6 | 27.3 |
| Maddie Gaynor | - | 25 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 2.9 | -0.7 | -87 | -4.3 | -6.9 | 21.9 | 23.5 | 46.7 | -0.27 | 29.0 | 24.7 |
| Elise Ayer | - | 24 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.7 | -75 | -3.1 | -6.4 | 22.9 | 100.0 | 50.0 | -0.95 | 29.2 | 24.3 |
| Grace Moltenbrey | - | 10 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 49 | 4.5 | 12.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.72 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Gianna Gioia | - | 14 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 69 | 4.3 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Kailee Mcphillips | - | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25 | 2.1 | 12.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.32 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG