Wellesley
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 948 (#337) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 934 (#328) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -10.7 (#291) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.337 (#526) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.270 (#307) | NetEff -7.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.116 (#537) | AdjNet -17.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.104 (#539) | AdjNet -18.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.261 (#533) | AdjO 52.9 | AdjD 64.4 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Regis (MA) | W | 65 - 55 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | Worcester St. | W | 57 - 55 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Colby-Sawyer | L | 51 - 56 |
| 2024-11-19 | @ | Lasell | L | 48 - 51 |
| 2024-11-22 | @ | St. Lawrence | L | 40 - 63 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Utica | L | 58 - 69 |
| 2024-12-03 | @ | Elms | W | 54 - 34 |
| 2024-12-06 | @ | Norwich | L | 45 - 59 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Keene St. | L | 53 - 65 |
| 2024-12-10 | vs | Salem St. | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2025-01-02 | vs | Wentworth | W | 62 - 52 |
| 2025-01-05 | vs | Colby | L | 59 - 62 |
| 2025-01-09 | @ | Dean | W | 70 - 40 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Clark (MA) | W | 72 - 60 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Emerson | L | 59 - 69 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Springfield | L | 33 - 57 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | MIT | L | 52 - 59 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Coast Guard | L | 64 - 81 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Babson | L | 38 - 56 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Salve Regina | L | 51 - 66 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Wheaton (MA) | W | 68 - 53 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Mount Holyoke | W | 61 - 41 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | WPI | L | 45 - 65 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Smith | L | 50 - 86 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Barrow | - | 24 | 36.5 | 12.6 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 11.8 | 10.3 | -15 | -0.6 | -0.5 | 38.4 | 28.3 | 73.2 | 0.01 | 47.9 | 44.0 |
| Ava Shane | - | 24 | 25.6 | 11.1 | 7.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 9.3 | 8.5 | -24 | -0.9 | -1.0 | 43.5 | 27.3 | 63.4 | -0.12 | 49.9 | 45.5 |
| Mirella Funari | - | 21 | 30.6 | 8.3 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 9.0 | 6.2 | 43 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 28.4 | 12.8 | 73.2 | 0.6 | 38.5 | 30.0 |
| Stacy Chen | - | 24 | 26.0 | 7.9 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 7.9 | 1.8 | -45 | -1.7 | -1.9 | 35.4 | 25.0 | 70.5 | -0.18 | 44.0 | 38.9 |
| Caitlin Windross | - | 22 | 22.0 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 8.8 | 4.0 | 25 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 28.5 | 20.7 | 68.6 | 0.33 | 36.5 | 33.2 |
| Arla Hofer | - | 23 | 25.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.0 | 0.0 | 87.5 | -0.11 | 37.2 | 33.0 |
| Emaleena Elson | - | 24 | 14.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.1 | -0.1 | 45 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 28.0 | 25.5 | 80.0 | 0.4 | 38.9 | 37.3 |
| Arielle Lepage | - | 4 | 10.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 34.0 | 20.0 |
| Bridget Sheahan | - | 19 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 37 | 2.8 | 6.9 | 52.4 | 0 | 60.0 | 0.39 | 53.9 | 52.4 |
| Proud Techarungchaikul | - | 20 | 13.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 25.6 | 20.0 | 33.3 | 0.35 | 31.2 | 30.8 |
| Yitzel Serna | - | 11 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 57.1 | 0 | - | 70.0 | 70.0 |
| Amanda Cheng | - | 21 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 22 | 1.6 | 14.3 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.24 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| P Techarungchaikul | - | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.35 | 0 | 0 |
| Proud Techarungchaik | - | 3 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG