Washington Huskies
2024 Team Stats (11 games)
58.4
PPG
63.5
Opp
-5.1
Margin
40.1%
FG%
32.0%
3P%
74.7%
FT%
30.5
RPG
10.9
APG
12.6
TO
73.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1183 (#43) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1260 (#44) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +42.8 (#31) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.794 (#79) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.910 (#25) | AdjNet +20.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.913 (#25) | AdjNet +20.4 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-10 | @ | Washington State Cougars | W | 60 - 55 |
| 2023-12-20 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | L | 51 - 59 |
| 2024-01-07 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 59 - 71 |
| 2024-01-26 | @ | UCLA Bruins | L | 44 - 62 |
| 2024-01-28 | @ | USC Trojans | W | 62 - 59 |
| 2024-02-02 | vs | Utah Utes | L | 65 - 83 |
| 2024-02-04 | vs | Colorado Buffaloes | L | 57 - 80 |
| 2024-02-09 | vs | Stanford Cardinal | L | 59 - 63 |
| 2024-02-25 | vs | Oregon State Beavers | W | 61 - 51 |
| 2024-02-29 | @ | Colorado Buffaloes | L | 62 - 68 |
| 2024-03-02 | @ | Utah Utes | W | 62 - 47 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Schwartz
|
F | 11 | 36.5 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 10.8 | 7.1 | 17 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 43.7 | 40.0 | 78.9 | 0.01 | 53.8 | 51.3 |
D. Daniels
|
F | 11 | 32.3 | 12.1 | 7.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 12.5 | 10.1 | -8 | -1.1 | -1.5 | 39.9 | 25.0 | 63.3 | -0.17 | 44.0 | 41.3 |
E. Ladine
|
G | 10 | 29.2 | 10.2 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 8.8 | 6.4 | 10 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 43.2 | 32.3 | 88.9 | -0.03 | 53.2 | 48.9 |
H. Stines
|
G | 11 | 31.9 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 8.8 | 6.0 | 12 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 42.3 | 32.5 | 88.9 | 0.01 | 51.0 | 49.0 |
S. Sellers
|
G | 11 | 27.2 | 9.3 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 9.1 | 4.8 | 142 | 14.2 | 14.5 | 41.0 | 32.0 | 66.7 | 1.0 | 49.7 | 49.0 |
C. Briggs
|
G | 11 | 23.2 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 2.0 | -14 | -1.8 | -2.8 | 21.3 | 25.9 | 63.6 | -0.24 | 32.8 | 28.7 |
A. Long
|
G | 4 | 10.2 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 1.8 | -34 | -5.7 | -14.1 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.36 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
J. Noble
|
G | 5 | 17.0 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 0.02 | 39.4 | 31.2 |
T. Brown
|
G | 10 | 11.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 32 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 50.0 | 40.0 | 0 | 0.44 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
O. Anderson
|
F | 4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | -0.17 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
S. Gillmer
|
F | 6 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG