Washington Col.
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1012 (#228) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1072 (#137) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -0.5 (#173) | HCA +2.4 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-11 | vs | Notre Dame (MD) | W | 83 - 53 |
| 2023-11-18 | @ | Immaculata | W | 59 - 48 |
| 2023-11-21 | @ | Marymount (VA) | L | 48 - 57 |
| 2023-11-28 | @ | Swarthmore | L | 39 - 55 |
| 2023-11-30 | vs | Franklin & Marshall | W | 43 - 42 |
| 2023-12-02 | vs | Gettysburg | L | 57 - 69 |
| 2023-12-05 | vs | Stevenson | W | 65 - 56 |
| 2023-12-07 | vs | Bryn Mawr | W | 71 - 37 |
| 2023-12-09 | @ | Haverford | W | 44 - 27 |
| 2023-12-30 | @ | Ramapo | L | 39 - 43 |
| 2024-01-06 | vs | Muhlenberg | W | 46 - 41 |
| 2024-01-09 | @ | Ursinus | L | 53 - 59 |
| 2024-01-13 | @ | Dickinson | L | 38 - 55 |
| 2024-01-17 | @ | Johns Hopkins | L | 43 - 47 |
| 2024-01-20 | @ | Gettysburg | L | 47 - 66 |
| 2024-01-23 | vs | McDaniel | W | 52 - 41 |
| 2024-01-25 | vs | Swarthmore | L | 49 - 58 |
| 2024-01-27 | @ | Muhlenberg | L | 54 - 66 |
| 2024-01-31 | vs | Haverford | W | 63 - 45 |
| 2024-02-03 | vs | Ursinus | W | 59 - 53 |
| 2024-02-06 | @ | Bryn Mawr | W | 62 - 28 |
| 2024-02-08 | @ | McDaniel | W | 56 - 43 |
| 2024-02-10 | vs | Dickinson | W | 70 - 66 |
| 2024-02-14 | vs | Johns Hopkins | L | 44 - 75 |
| 2024-02-17 | @ | Franklin & Marshall | W | 58 - 51 |
| 2024-02-20 | vs | Ursinus | L | 40 - 50 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serena Pluta | - | 12 | 22.3 | 10.6 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 9.8 | 5.9 | - | - | - | 32.5 | 14.3 | 74.2 | -0.26 | 43.5 | 33.3 |
| Karry Kelliher | - | 12 | 32.0 | 9.3 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 10.2 | 3.8 | -56 | -8.0 | -12.0 | 33.3 | 21.1 | 68.4 | -0.53 | 40.1 | 35.0 |
| Kaitlyn Boggs | - | 12 | 24.8 | 8.5 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 7.2 | 9.6 | -44 | -3.4 | -3.6 | 44.8 | 0.0 | 57.1 | -0.44 | 48.4 | 44.8 |
| Abby Meredith | - | 12 | 31.2 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 8.2 | 1.9 | -36 | -2.8 | -2.8 | 35.4 | 38.7 | 72.7 | -0.22 | 45.1 | 41.4 |
| Peyton Berger | - | 12 | 18.5 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 2.0 | -10 | -1.1 | -1.7 | 32.7 | 6.7 | 75.0 | 0.31 | 39.8 | 33.7 |
| Kiersten Rose | - | 12 | 21.8 | 3.6 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 6.3 | -9 | -1.3 | -1.9 | 34.9 | 0.0 | 81.2 | 0.03 | 43.0 | 34.9 |
| Kaleigh White | - | 12 | 15.0 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 25.7 | 11.1 | 92.9 | 0.16 | 38.9 | 27.1 |
| Emma Robinson | - | 11 | 26.2 | 1.2 | 6.5 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 0.02 | 18.4 | 6.7 |
| Avery Thomas | - | 12 | 8.9 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 0.8 | -10 | -1.4 | -4.3 | 24.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.12 | 23.2 | 24.0 |
| Bryson Ostrum | - | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG