๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Wagner

2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)

46.3
PPG
-
Opp
-
Margin
31.3%
FG%
30.2%
3P%
72.7%
FT%
28.8
RPG
7.0
APG
27.5
TO
71.8
Est. poss./game
43.5
Adj PPG
78.3
Adj Opp PPG
#363
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 669 (returning production + recruiting): last season 847, returning -89, transfers -89, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 661 (#347) Preseason prior 669 (returning production + recruiting): last season 847, returning -89, transfers -89, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 760 (#352) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 764 (#352) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -36.0 (#362) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ -35.9 (#362) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.004 (#361) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -49.5 More โ†’ 0.024 (#363) AdjNet -49.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -49.2 More โ†’ 0.022 (#363) AdjNet -49.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 43.5 | AdjD 78.3 More โ†’ 0.067 (#363) AdjO 43.5 | AdjD 78.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 43.5 | AdjD 78.3 More โ†’ 0.068 (#363) AdjO 43.5 | AdjD 78.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.058 (#363) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.058 (#363) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 181 | GP 3 More โ†’ 730 (#352) RD 181 | GP 3
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.058 (#362) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs SUNY Cortland Red Dragons W 80 - 72
2026-11-05 @ Lafayette Leopards L 34 - 88
2026-11-07 @ St. John's Red Storm L 33 - 102
2026-11-12 vs Rhode Island Rams L 38 - 88
2026-11-20 vs Rider Broncs - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Stella Sgro Stella Sgro G 2 19.5 8.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 7.5 3.0 -8 2 -4.0 -8.3 33.3 33.3 100.0 -2.44 50.7 43.3
Sophia Priestley Sophia Priestley F 4 28.2 8.0 4.2 0.8 0.2 0.2 4.5 7.5 1.5 -94 4 -23.5 -33.2 40.0 66.7 50.0 -3.8 45.4 43.3
Alivia Landy Alivia Landy G 4 27.8 7.8 5.2 1.2 2.2 1.2 2.5 5.5 9.8 -86 4 -21.5 -31.3 40.9 50.0 78.6 -3.08 55.0 45.5
Lana Beslic Lana Beslic G 4 31.8 7.2 2.2 3.2 0.8 0.0 5.5 7.0 1.0 -122 4 -30.5 -38.9 42.9 37.5 50.0 -3.82 48.7 48.2
Avery Blue Avery Blue G 4 20.0 7.2 2.0 0.5 2.8 0.2 3.5 8.5 0.8 -62 4 -15.5 -31.1 26.5 29.2 100.0 -1.64 40.5 36.8
Ternadoo Agatha Agba Ternadoo Agatha Agba G 4 21.0 3.5 2.8 0.8 1.5 0.2 1.5 6.5 0.8 -88 4 -22.0 -41.3 19.2 0.0 80.0 -5.5 24.8 19.2
Nahia Esnaola Nahia Esnaola F 4 19.2 3.0 3.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.2 4.2 2.5 -95 4 -23.8 -50.1 29.4 0 50.0 -4.0 32.0 29.4
Jada Johnson Jada Johnson G 3 13.0 2.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.0 2.7 3.0 -2.0 -62 3 -20.7 -64.1 33.3 20.0 0 -5.41 38.9 38.9
Layla Mapp Layla Mapp G 4 7.0 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.8 -0.2 -44 4 -11.0 -63.6 28.6 0.0 100.0 -3.21 38.1 28.6
Sylia Vigka Sylia Vigka G 4 7.5 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.2 1.5 -2.2 -52 4 -13.0 -67.5 16.7 25.0 100.0 -5.48 36.3 25.0
Janna Dauer Janna Dauer C 4 10.0 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.8 0.5 1.5 0.5 1.2 -50 4 -12.5 -52.2 0.0 0 100.0 -4.14 34.7 0.0
Fati Fall Fati Fall F 4 8.0 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 1.2 0.8 -32 4 -8.0 -40.6 0.0 0 50.0 -0.53 8.5 0.0
Ama Ofori Ama Ofori G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shamique Cummings Shamique Cummings F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Saioa San Francisco Saioa San Francisco G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

201 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Priestley33% Priestley21% Beslic100% Landy50% Beslic50% Beslic50% Landy100% Blue38% Blue67% Blue67%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Blue20% Priestley26% Agba50% Agba50% Beslic45% Sgro100% Landy50% Blue53% Blue32%
Misses: who misses most here

Lana BeslicSophia PriestleyAvery BlueAlivia LandyStella SgroTernadoo Agatha Agba

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 18-38 47.4 36 Sophia Priestley 33% (12 pts) Lana Beslic 22% (8 pts) Avery Blue 20% (4 misses) Alivia Landy 15% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 19-69 27.5 38 Sophia Priestley 21% (8 pts) Nahia Esnaola 16% (6 pts) Sophia Priestley 26% (13 misses) Nahia Esnaola 16% (8 misses)
Mid-range left 1-11 9.1 2 Lana Beslic 100% (2 pts) - Ternadoo Agatha Agba 50% (5 misses) Sophia Priestley 20% (2 misses)
Mid-range center 2-6 33.3 4 Alivia Landy 50% (2 pts) Stella Sgro 50% (2 pts) Ternadoo Agatha Agba 50% (2 misses) Jada Johnson 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 4-15 26.7 8 Lana Beslic 50% (4 pts) Alivia Landy 25% (2 pts) Lana Beslic 45% (5 misses) Alivia Landy 18% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 4-5 80.0 12 Lana Beslic 50% (6 pts) Jada Johnson 25% (3 pts) Stella Sgro 100% (1 misses) -
Right corner 3 1-3 33.3 3 Alivia Landy 100% (3 pts) - Alivia Landy 50% (1 misses) Avery Blue 50% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 8-23 34.8 24 Avery Blue 38% (9 pts) Alivia Landy 12% (3 pts) Avery Blue 53% (8 misses) Lana Beslic 20% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 3-3 100.0 9 Avery Blue 67% (6 pts) Sophia Priestley 33% (3 pts) - -
Above-break 3 right 3-28 10.7 9 Avery Blue 67% (6 pts) Stella Sgro 33% (3 pts) Avery Blue 32% (8 misses) Jada Johnson 16% (4 misses)