🐻⬇️🏀

W. Virginia Tech Golden Bears

Season: 2026 2024 2012 2011 2010 2009 2007 2004
Also known as: W. Virginia Tech Golden Bears
Program History

2024 Team Stats (1 games)

72.0
PPG
108.0
Opp
-36.0
Margin
42.2%
FG%
36.7%
3P%
70.0%
FT%
35.0
RPG
11.0
APG
25.0
TO
93.4
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +109 elo More → 994 (#416) HCA +109 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.5 More → -23.8 (#644) HCA +2.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 70.9 | AdjD 74.7 More → 0.416 (#582) AdjO 70.9 | AdjD 74.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.183 (#593) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.222 (#595) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 926 (#386) RD 350 | GP 1

2024 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2023-11-07 @ Eastern Kentucky Colonels L 72 - 108

2024 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
B. Chapman B. Chapman - 1 34.0 18.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 13.0 7.0 - - - 53.8 42.9 100.0 - 67.0 65.4
T. Hailey T. Hailey - 1 34.0 17.0 10.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 6.0 13.0 14.0 - - - 61.5 0 100.0 - 63.2 61.5
B. Smithers B. Smithers - 1 35.0 12.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 16.0 -2.0 - - - 25.0 30.0 50.0 - 35.5 34.4
C. Danser C. Danser - 1 18.0 11.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 - - - 75.0 75.0 100.0 - 112.7 112.5
A. Work A. Work - 1 24.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 8.0 0.0 - - - 25.0 0.0 50.0 - 28.2 25.0
L. Craven L. Craven - 1 12.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 -2.0 - - - 20.0 20.0 0 - 30.0 30.0
C. Chapman C. Chapman - 1 23.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 9.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - 52.1 50.0
S. Tesfit S. Tesfit - 1 5.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 - - - 100.0 100.0 0 - 150.0 150.0
A. Parker A. Parker - 1 12.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 -3.0 62 3.0 21.8 0.0 0.0 0 0.35 0.0 0.0
M. Linville M. Linville - 1 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG