Virginia Tech Hokies
2017 Team Stats (20 games)
71.1
PPG
69.9
Opp
+1.1
Margin
39.5%
FG%
29.0%
3P%
68.0%
FT%
38.8
RPG
11.4
APG
13.5
TO
87.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2016-2017
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1203 (#56) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1402 (#36) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +40.9 (#34) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.950 (#28) | - |
2017 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-27 | vs | Tennessee Lady Volunteers | W | 67 - 63 |
| 2016-12-05 | vs | Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs | W | 76 - 42 |
| 2016-12-07 | vs | Central Connecticut Blue Devils | W | 81 - 47 |
| 2016-12-11 | vs | Bowling Green Falcons | W | 98 - 51 |
| 2016-12-18 | @ | Auburn Tigers | W | 92 - 87 |
| 2016-12-21 | vs | Radford Highlanders | W | 71 - 52 |
| 2016-12-30 | vs | Delaware State Hornets | W | 88 - 48 |
| 2017-01-02 | vs | North Carolina Tar Heels | W | 76 - 68 |
| 2017-01-08 | @ | Clemson Tigers | W | 78 - 69 |
| 2017-01-11 | @ | Miami Hurricanes | L | 75 - 82 |
| 2017-01-16 | vs | Wake Forest Demon Deacons | W | 72 - 70 |
| 2017-01-19 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 59 - 84 |
| 2017-01-22 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 54 - 82 |
| 2017-01-26 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | L | 27 - 76 |
| 2017-01-29 | vs | Syracuse Orange | L | 72 - 82 |
| 2017-02-02 | vs | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 59 - 76 |
| 2017-02-09 | vs | Louisville Cardinals | L | 70 - 88 |
| 2017-02-12 | @ | NC State Wolfpack | L | 71 - 85 |
| 2017-02-23 | vs | Miami Hurricanes | L | 69 - 79 |
| 2017-03-01 | vs | Clemson Tigers | L | 66 - 67 |
2017 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Hicks
|
G | 20 | 32.1 | 15.8 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 13.7 | 12.4 | - | - | - | 42.7 | 14.3 | 65.6 | 1.1 | 48.4 | 43.2 |
R. Magarity
|
F | 19 | 33.4 | 13.8 | 11.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 15.2 | - | - | - | 51.2 | 34.0 | 66.1 | 1.23 | 57.3 | 55.1 |
S. Cook
|
F | 19 | 30.9 | 13.7 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 11.4 | 10.2 | - | - | - | 45.8 | 31.7 | 65.8 | 0.29 | 52.3 | 48.8 |
S. Hill
|
G | 20 | 31.8 | 9.7 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 10.2 | 3.9 | - | - | - | 31.5 | 25.8 | 78.4 | 1.0 | 42.8 | 37.7 |
V. Panousis
|
G | 20 | 29.8 | 9.3 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 9.8 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 33.0 | 30.3 | 89.5 | 1.01 | 45.5 | 43.1 |
K. Brooks
|
G | 20 | 23.2 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 6.7 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 28.4 | 30.7 | 50.0 | 0.81 | 41.6 | 41.4 |
D. DaRosa
|
G | 8 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 0.0 | 71.4 | - | 40.2 | 35.7 |
K. Kinder
|
G | 20 | 10.2 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 39.0 | 42.9 | 25.0 | -0.28 | 41.6 | 42.7 |
E. Brooks
|
F | 13 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.22 | 37.5 | 31.2 |
T. Nahodil
|
C | 14 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.34 | 47.0 | 45.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG