Vanderbilt Commodores
2023 Team Stats (4 games)
70.0
PPG
84.0
Opp
-14.0
Margin
38.0%
FG%
43.1%
3P%
74.2%
FT%
28.8
RPG
12.8
APG
13.3
TO
82.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1419 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1415 (#9) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +47.4 (#20) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.881 (#45) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-24 | @ | NC State Wolfpack | L | 73 - 82 |
| 2023-01-01 | @ | LSU Tigers | L | 63 - 88 |
| 2023-01-16 | @ | Arkansas Razorbacks | L | 81 - 84 |
| 2023-02-23 | vs | LSU Tigers | L | 63 - 82 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Harbison
|
G | 4 | 38.5 | 24.2 | 3.2 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 19.8 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 39.2 | 47.8 | 82.8 | - | 52.9 | 46.2 |
M. Garraud
|
G | 4 | 37.0 | 13.0 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 13.8 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 32.7 | 38.7 | 66.7 | - | 45.1 | 43.6 |
J. Brown
|
G | 4 | 27.0 | 10.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.2 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 44.8 | 47.8 | 75.0 | - | 65.0 | 63.8 |
S. Washington
|
F | 4 | 26.2 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 7.2 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 37.9 | 0 | 63.6 | - | 42.8 | 37.9 |
R. Allen
|
G | 4 | 20.5 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 6.5 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 35.0 | 71.4 | - | 48.1 | 44.2 |
D. Washington
|
G | 4 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
B. LaChance
|
G | 4 | 14.8 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 33.3 | 75.0 | - | 77.3 | 75.0 |
Y. Chambers
|
F | 4 | 21.2 | 2.0 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 38.3 | 40.0 |
A. Williams
|
F | 1 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG