🐻⬇️🏀

Utah Valley

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2021 2020 2019
Also known as: Utah Valley
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1055 (#155) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More → 1000 (#284) HCA +95 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +15.2 (#101) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.995 (#42) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +36.0 More → 0.985 (#29) AdjNet +36.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +35.7 More → 0.986 (#30) AdjNet +35.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 90.1 | AdjD 63.3 More → 0.920 (#34) AdjO 90.1 | AdjD 63.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 78.1 | AdjD 73.4 More → 0.605 (#140) AdjO 78.1 | AdjD 73.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.769 (#88) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.734 (#103) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 350 | GP 1 More → 1064 (#163) RD 350 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-12 vs Westminster (UT) W 91 - 60

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Tyler Hendricks - 1 26.5 22.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 10.0 16.0 - - - 70.0 66.7 80.0 - 90.2 90.0
Jackson Holcombe - 1 31.1 16.0 10.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 9.0 26.0 - - - 66.7 50.0 75.0 - 74.3 72.2
Isaac Davis - 1 18.4 14.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 8.0 -43 -2.0 -17.0 66.7 0.0 100.0 -0.32 70.9 66.7
Braden Housley - 1 26.1 12.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 10.0 - - - 60.0 33.3 83.3 - 78.5 70.0
Trevan Leonhardt - 1 30.6 11.0 7.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 24.0 - - - 66.7 50.0 100.0 - 79.9 75.0
Isaac Hawkins - 1 18.1 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 11.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Hayden Welling - 1 12.8 4.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 -2.0 - - - 28.6 0.0 0 - 28.6 28.6
Noah Taitz - 1 11.8 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 45.2 0.0
Sherman Weatherspoon IV - 1 10.1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 - - - 50.0 100.0 0 - 75.0 75.0
Tyler Weaver - 1 7.4 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 0.0 - 41.0 50.0
Joul Karram - 1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Tyler Medaris - 1 2.7 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
AJ Riggs - 1 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG