Utah Tech Trailblazers
2026 Team Stats (23 games)
62.7
PPG
67.0
Opp
-4.3
Margin
37.8%
FG%
31.1%
3P%
69.2%
FT%
36.6
RPG
13.6
APG
17.1
TO
81.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 928 (#499) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +2.9 (#289) | HCA +2.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.411 (#439) | AdjO 62.0 | AdjD 65.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.523 (#286) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.493 (#284) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 905 (#390) | RD 140 | GP 23 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Borden
|
G | 23 | 34.3 | 15.3 | 4.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 14.5 | 6.2 | -49 | -2.5 | -2.9 | 38.7 | 35.1 | 78.0 | 1.81 | 48.9 | 45.8 |
B. Crittendon
|
G | 22 | 33.7 | 11.4 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 8.7 | 9.6 | -62 | -3.3 | -3.8 | 42.9 | 30.8 | 91.7 | 1.35 | 57.7 | 51.3 |
P. Cofer
|
F | 23 | 27.4 | 9.2 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 8.0 | 6.3 | -27 | -1.4 | -1.8 | 44.0 | 30.3 | 65.9 | -0.32 | 52.5 | 50.3 |
Mad. Warren
|
G | 8 | 19.4 | 8.5 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 6.8 | 5.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.0 | 33.3 | 66.7 | 0.11 | 51.6 | 46.3 |
C. Hartley
|
G | 23 | 35.2 | 7.5 | 2.9 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 3.6 | 7.4 | 5.9 | -92 | -4.6 | -5.2 | 29.2 | 21.5 | 58.6 | -1.95 | 40.1 | 33.3 |
L. Crocker
|
F | 23 | 26.3 | 7.4 | 8.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 7.5 | 10.1 | -84 | -4.2 | -8.3 | 35.3 | 32.2 | 70.4 | -3.78 | 46.0 | 43.6 |
C. Dallas
|
G | 23 | 15.1 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 3.9 | -71 | -3.5 | -10.1 | 37.0 | 33.9 | 83.3 | -2.49 | 54.3 | 51.4 |
M. Mili
|
G | 18 | 13.7 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 1.3 | -46 | -2.4 | -8.4 | 36.8 | 22.6 | 66.7 | 0.03 | 46.4 | 43.0 |
R. Boisnel
|
F | 16 | 9.4 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 0.6 | -35 | -3.9 | -16.8 | 31.9 | 27.8 | 14.3 | -1.99 | 35.9 | 37.2 |
A. Colic
|
G | 17 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 7 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 39.1 | 50.0 | 61.5 | 2.26 | 54.0 | 50.0 |
A. Shimada
|
F | 14 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | -37 | -2.8 | -34.8 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 40.0 | -4.13 | 28.8 | 16.7 |
Mac. Warren
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 |
E. Taylor
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 51 | 2.0 | 3.1 | - | - | - | 3.39 | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG