Union (NY)
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1098 (#79) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1125 (#76) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +3.1 (#153) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.592 (#409) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.761 (#140) | NetEff +8.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.550 (#366) | AdjNet +1.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.548 (#364) | AdjNet +1.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.495 (#377) | AdjO 61.2 | AdjD 61.5 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | @ | UMass Dartmouth | L | 49 - 68 |
| 2024-11-10 | vs | Wheaton (MA) | W | 67 - 57 |
| 2024-11-12 | @ | Utica | W | 91 - 61 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Middlebury | L | 47 - 72 |
| 2024-11-30 | @ | SUNY Cobleskill | L | 55 - 74 |
| 2024-12-03 | vs | Mount Holyoke | W | 77 - 27 |
| 2024-12-06 | @ | William Smith | W | 59 - 39 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | RIT | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2024-12-10 | @ | Colgate | L | 51 - 92 |
| 2024-12-12 | @ | Bard | W | 63 - 29 |
| 2025-01-07 | vs | Bard | W | 54 - 31 |
| 2025-01-10 | vs | Ithaca | W | 66 - 62 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Skidmore | W | 74 - 57 |
| 2025-01-17 | vs | St. Lawrence | L | 47 - 59 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Clarkson | W | 60 - 45 |
| 2025-01-24 | @ | Vassar | W | 60 - 49 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Rensselaer | W | 63 - 59 |
| 2025-01-31 | @ | Skidmore | L | 72 - 76 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Ithaca | L | 61 - 74 |
| 2025-02-07 | vs | Rensselaer | W | 59 - 46 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Vassar | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2025-02-14 | @ | Clarkson | L | 60 - 67 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | St. Lawrence | L | 56 - 59 |
| 2025-02-21 | vs | RIT | L | 63 - 64 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | William Smith | W | 73 - 44 |
| 2025-02-25 | @ | Skidmore | L | 43 - 46 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Perovic | - | 23 | 26.9 | 12.9 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 11.8 | 9.7 | 87 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 44.5 | 0.0 | 75.3 | 0.26 | 48.8 | 44.5 |
| Jenna Forman | - | 26 | 25.3 | 10.2 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 8.0 | 10.1 | 23 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 48.6 | 24.1 | 70.0 | 0.29 | 54.5 | 50.2 |
| Olivia Cunningham | - | 26 | 15.6 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 7.3 | 5.0 | 54 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 42.3 | 50.0 | 68.2 | 0.3 | 44.3 | 42.6 |
| Grace Ceseretti | - | 23 | 21.3 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 73 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 31.1 | 29.9 | 75.0 | 0.29 | 42.5 | 38.9 |
| Emma Riley | - | 26 | 22.2 | 6.2 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 7.3 | 4.4 | -30 | -1.2 | -1.6 | 32.5 | 28.4 | 75.0 | -0.39 | 39.9 | 37.4 |
| Kate Peek | - | 16 | 23.2 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 7.8 | 1.7 | 15 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 26.4 | 22.8 | 76.5 | 0.51 | 37.7 | 34.8 |
| Grace Ardito | - | 26 | 14.4 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 2.6 | 125 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 38.0 | 34.7 | 54.5 | 0.55 | 48.7 | 47.7 |
| Sophia Poplyk | - | 23 | 17.6 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1.7 | -22 | -1.0 | -1.8 | 36.5 | 36.7 | 50.0 | -0.42 | 45.3 | 43.9 |
| Claudia Porto | - | 24 | 12.7 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 | -42 | -1.9 | -3.4 | 38.0 | 14.3 | 52.0 | -0.84 | 41.5 | 38.7 |
| Grace Arcoleo | - | 26 | 26.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 5.7 | -2 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 36.2 | 21.1 | 53.8 | 0.21 | 42.3 | 39.1 |
| Casey Weeren | - | 4 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 48.4 | 38.9 |
| Morgan Schultz | - | 26 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 50 | 2.2 | 6.3 | 51.2 | 100.0 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 49.9 | 52.4 |
| Davita Honig | - | 24 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | -11 | -0.9 | -5.6 | 35.0 | 25.0 | 0 | -0.37 | 42.5 | 42.5 |
| Aiko Bastiaens | - | 24 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | -3 | -0.2 | -1.9 | 63.6 | 0.0 | 25.0 | -0.01 | 58.8 | 63.6 |
| Anna O'Keefe | - | 25 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 36 | 2.6 | 24.0 | 44.4 | 42.9 | 0 | 0.16 | 61.1 | 61.1 |
| Julia Finney | - | 2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Ally Burke | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -27 | -3.4 | -7.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.18 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG