UTEP Miners
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 919 (#527) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1111 (#110) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +19.0 (#171) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.645 (#114) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-20 | vs | Northern Arizona Lumberjacks | W | 68 - 49 |
| 2005-11-22 | vs | New Mexico State Aggies | W | 70 - 58 |
| 2005-11-25 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | L | 63 - 68 |
| 2005-11-27 | @ | Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns | L | 61 - 65 |
| 2005-11-30 | @ | New Mexico State Aggies | W | 66 - 47 |
| 2005-12-04 | vs | UT Arlington Mavericks | L | 53 - 58 |
| 2005-12-11 | @ | North Texas Mean Green | L | 58 - 60 |
| 2005-12-13 | @ | Northern Colorado Bears | W | 85 - 57 |
| 2005-12-18 | vs | Illinois State Redbirds | L | 71 - 83 |
| 2005-12-21 | vs | UT Permian Basin Falcons | W | 103 - 61 |
| 2005-12-29 | @ | Texas Southern Tigers | W | 80 - 61 |
| 2005-12-30 | vs | Texas State Bobcats | W | 76 - 63 |
| 2006-01-02 | vs | UT Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros | W | 80 - 34 |
| 2006-01-06 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 73 - 66 |
| 2006-01-08 | vs | SMU Mustangs | W | 80 - 69 |
| 2006-01-13 | @ | Southern Miss Lady Eagles | L | 55 - 57 |
| 2006-01-15 | @ | UCF Knights | L | 46 - 51 |
| 2006-01-22 | vs | UAB Blazers | W | 72 - 69 |
| 2006-01-27 | @ | Rice Owls | L | 32 - 83 |
| 2006-01-29 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 50 - 64 |
| 2006-02-04 | @ | Tulane Green Wave | W | 59 - 58 |
| 2006-02-06 | @ | Memphis Tigers | L | 66 - 71 |
| 2006-02-10 | vs | Rice Owls | L | 49 - 63 |
| 2006-02-12 | vs | Houston Cougars | W | 77 - 67 |
| 2006-02-17 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | L | 72 - 77 |
| 2006-02-19 | vs | Marshall Thundering Herd | W | 77 - 63 |
| 2006-02-24 | @ | SMU Mustangs | L | 46 - 59 |
| 2006-02-26 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 48 - 64 |
| 2006-03-02 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 40 - 57 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Williams
|
- | 1 | 35.0 | 16.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 80.0 | - | 65.6 | 60.0 |
M. Ayala
|
- | 1 | 22.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 42.9 | 100.0 | - | 60.4 | 50.0 |
B. Williamson
|
G | 1 | 32.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 48.4 | 44.4 |
M. Thomas
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 83.3 | 0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
J. Tofi
|
- | 1 | 32.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 58.1 | 50.0 |
S. Jackson
|
- | 1 | 21.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
W. Kimble
|
- | 1 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
K. Henderson
|
- | 1 | 21.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 10.2 | 0.0 |
B. Murphy
|
- | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG