πŸ»β¬‡οΈπŸ€

UT Permian Basin

Also known as: UT Permian Basin
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More β†’ 930 (#433) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More β†’ 946 (#350) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More β†’ 950 (#481) HCA +95 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More β†’ +3.5 (#224) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More β†’ -1.9 (#359) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More β†’ 0.503 (#333) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -16.5 More β†’ 0.137 (#276) NetEff -16.5
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +10.5 More β†’ 0.770 (#254) AdjNet +10.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +10.4 More β†’ 0.772 (#256) AdjNet +10.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 80.2 | AdjD 72.0 More β†’ 0.678 (#253) AdjO 80.2 | AdjD 72.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 79.7 | AdjD 83.0 More β†’ 0.427 (#430) AdjO 79.7 | AdjD 83.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More β†’ 0.424 (#381) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More β†’ 0.422 (#381) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 99 | GP 23 More β†’ 948 (#282) RD 99 | GP 23

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 @ UTEP - Incomplete score
2025-11-14 vs Adams St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-15 vs Western Colo. - Incomplete score
2025-11-18 vs McMurry - Incomplete score
2025-11-22 @ Sul Ross St. - Incomplete score
2025-11-28 @ CSU Pueblo - Incomplete score
2025-11-29 @ MSU Denver - Incomplete score
2025-12-03 @ Lubbock Christian - Incomplete score
2025-12-05 @ Midwestern St. - Incomplete score
2025-12-11 vs Tex. A&M-Kingsville - Incomplete score
2025-12-13 vs Tex. A&M Int'l - Incomplete score
2025-12-16 @ Pittsburg St. - Incomplete score
2025-12-17 @ Ark.-Fort Smith - Incomplete score
2026-01-02 vs DBU - Incomplete score
2026-01-04 vs UT Tyler - Incomplete score
2026-01-08 @ Okla. Christian - Incomplete score
2026-01-10 @ Cameron - Incomplete score
2026-01-13 @ Angelo St. - Incomplete score
2026-01-17 vs Texas-Dallas - Incomplete score
2026-01-22 @ Tex. A&M Int'l - Incomplete score
2026-01-29 vs Angelo St. - Incomplete score
2026-02-05 vs Sul Ross St. - Incomplete score
2026-02-07 vs Western N.M. - Incomplete score

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Tash Lunday - 22 36.0 17.7 8.5 1.5 0.6 0.3 2.0 11.4 15.2 -102 -4.6 -24.6 47.8 42.1 83.6 -2.32 60.6 51.0
Sharrod Taylor - 18 28.6 15.4 4.2 4.2 1.7 0.1 2.9 11.4 11.3 -3 -0.2 -0.8 40.0 41.7 71.9 1.48 56.9 52.2
Bryceson Burns - 22 32.4 12.9 3.8 2.9 1.4 1.0 2.3 10.0 9.5 -80 -3.6 -19.4 44.3 36.4 73.9 0.25 56.3 52.5
Phoenix Bullock - 14 27.0 11.2 3.6 1.1 1.8 0.4 0.8 10.2 7.1 - - - 40.6 22.4 63.6 -0.15 48.3 45.1
Rashad Kee - 22 24.2 10.4 4.7 0.9 0.8 0.3 1.0 7.6 8.5 -68 -3.1 -35.6 52.4 0 73.2 -0.87 57.2 52.4
Kainan Thomas - 8 16.5 7.1 0.6 1.4 0.5 0.1 1.9 5.8 2.1 -22 -2.8 -61.2 43.5 43.8 37.5 -0.9 57.6 58.7
Connor Morris - 22 17.7 6.5 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.9 5.3 3.3 -42 -1.9 -33.8 44.4 36.3 62.5 -0.76 58.9 58.5
Kyle McElroy - 22 25.9 3.8 5.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 1.1 2.7 6.4 -45 -2.0 -14.6 55.0 0 58.1 0.87 57.0 55.0
Marcus Burnett - 11 10.6 2.6 2.4 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.9 3.6 1.7 -14 -1.3 -20.8 25.0 0.0 64.3 -1.1 31.4 25.0
Brady Watson - 21 8.1 2.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.7 1.3 -33 -1.6 -50.1 30.6 28.6 75.0 -3.49 48.0 38.9
Mouhamadou CissΓ© - 2 15.3 2.0 4.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 1.5 4.5 -11 -5.5 -20.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 -0.14 42.0 0.0
Tristan Lewis - 20 9.3 1.4 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.7 1.5 1.5 -10 -0.5 -2.1 20.0 13.3 58.3 -2.38 34.5 23.3
Diego Rodriguez - 1 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG