UNLV Lady Rebels
2023 Team Stats (10 games)
73.0
PPG
58.7
Opp
+14.3
Margin
46.0%
FG%
33.7%
3P%
71.1%
FT%
38.9
RPG
16.6
APG
12.1
TO
78.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1107 (#121) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1213 (#74) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +30.2 (#81) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.791 (#81) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | vs | George Washington Revolutionaries | W | 73 - 63 |
| 2023-01-16 | vs | Boise State Broncos | W | 73 - 61 |
| 2023-02-16 | vs | San José State Spartans | W | 77 - 60 |
| 2023-02-23 | vs | Utah State Aggies | W | 86 - 32 |
| 2023-02-25 | vs | San Diego State Aztecs | W | 65 - 59 |
| 2023-02-28 | @ | Nevada Wolf Pack | W | 71 - 66 |
| 2023-03-06 | vs | Nevada Wolf Pack | W | 84 - 47 |
| 2023-03-07 | vs | San Diego State Aztecs | W | 71 - 68 |
| 2023-03-08 | vs | Wyoming Cowgirls | W | 71 - 60 |
| 2023-03-17 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | L | 59 - 71 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Obiazor
|
F | 1 | 30.0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 63.6 | 100.0 | 50.0 | - | 70.5 | 72.7 |
D. Young
|
C | 10 | 29.1 | 17.6 | 9.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 11.4 | 16.2 | - | - | - | 58.8 | 50.0 | 74.5 | - | 63.7 | 59.2 |
E. Booker
|
G | 10 | 32.3 | 11.4 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 12.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 22.6 | 85.3 | - | 40.7 | 34.0 |
A. Brown
|
F | 10 | 28.9 | 9.4 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 7.7 | 13.9 | - | - | - | 50.6 | 28.6 | 53.3 | - | 56.2 | 55.8 |
A. Durazo-Frescas
|
G | 10 | 25.8 | 9.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 7.1 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 42.3 | 40.7 | 69.2 | - | 60.6 | 59.2 |
J. Ethridge
|
G | 10 | 30.3 | 9.1 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 6.9 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 53.6 | 29.6 | 52.9 | - | 59.5 | 59.4 |
K. Jackson
|
G | 10 | 22.9 | 7.1 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 6.0 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 42.1 | 76.5 | - | 52.6 | 48.3 |
A. Scoggin
|
G | 1 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 86.8 | 75.0 |
K. Winfrey
|
G | 9 | 16.1 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 25.0 | 75.0 | - | 42.5 | 40.0 |
K. Wilfred
|
C | 7 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 77.8 | 100.0 | 25.0 | - | 79.0 | 88.9 |
J. Lott
|
G | 9 | 8.6 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 48.8 | 42.1 |
E. Collins
|
C | 3 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG