🐻⬇️🏀

UNC Wilmington

2026-2027: 2-1 · CAA

Season: 2026-2027 2025-2026 2024-2025 2023-2024 2022-2023
Also known as: UNC Wilmington Seahawks
Program History

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

68.3
PPG
52.3
Opp
+16.0
Margin
42.5%
FG%
40.0%
3P%
57.9%
FT%
34.0
RPG
12.0
APG
17.3
TO
73.4
Est. poss./game
58.6
Adj PPG
59.2
Adj Opp PPG
#284
Adj Margin Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 722 (returning production + recruiting): last season 838, returning -95, transfers -21, freshmen +0 More → 733 (#324) Preseason prior 722 (returning production + recruiting): last season 838, returning -95, transfers -21, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More → 814 (#329) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More → 817 (#329) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More → -12.5 (#285) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More → -12.5 (#285) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.277 (#217) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -0.4 More → 0.297 (#260) AdjNet -0.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -1.1 More → 0.291 (#261) AdjNet -1.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 58.6 | AdjD 59.2 More → 0.310 (#284) AdjO 58.6 | AdjD 59.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 58.5 | AdjD 59.2 More → 0.312 (#283) AdjO 58.5 | AdjD 59.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.264 (#287) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.265 (#287) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 196 | GP 2 More → 817 (#311) RD 196 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More → 0.190 (#309) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-03 vs Barton Bulldogs W 75 - 44
2026-11-07 vs North Carolina Central Eagles W 82 - 48
2026-11-12 @ Wake Forest Demon Deacons L 48 - 65
2026-11-16 @ Presbyterian Blue Hose - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions and box-score rates; an unlisted position is inferred from those rates, and missing rates are treated as zero. Legend numbers are each player's share of recorded roster minutes, scaled to five players' regulation minutes; they can differ from minutes per game in the roster below, especially when players miss games or coverage is incomplete. Each position column totals one regulation game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Tiara Thompson Tiara Thompson G 3 25.0 13.7 3.0 2.0 3.7 0.0 1.0 12.0 9.3 66 3 22.0 37.5 47.2 37.5 57.1 3.23 52.5 51.4
Loghan Johnson Loghan Johnson G 3 25.7 13.0 8.0 1.0 2.3 0.3 1.7 9.3 13.7 58 3 19.3 30.7 57.1 60.0 57.1 3.27 62.7 62.5
Sienna Dauer Sienna Dauer G 3 27.0 11.3 2.3 1.0 2.0 0.3 0.7 10.7 5.7 52 3 17.3 25.2 37.5 30.8 66.7 -0.62 47.3 43.8
Naylee Cortes Naylee Cortes F 3 21.3 7.7 3.0 1.3 1.3 0.0 4.0 6.7 2.7 51 3 17.0 31.6 55.0 - 50.0 0.72 55.1 55.0
Ebbony Wilson Ebbony Wilson G 3 13.7 4.7 0.3 1.0 1.7 0.0 1.7 4.3 1.7 -2 3 -0.7 -2.1 38.5 44.4 - -2.95 53.8 53.8
Kimmie Hicks Kimmie Hicks G 3 24.0 4.3 3.0 2.7 1.3 0.0 1.0 3.3 7.0 52 3 17.3 29.5 20.0 100.0 70.0 2.41 45.1 30.0
Bella Toomey Bella Toomey F 3 11.3 4.3 2.0 0.3 1.3 0.7 1.0 2.7 5.0 15 3 5.0 19.9 62.5 - 50.0 0.11 61.1 62.5
Promise Njoku Promise Njoku G 3 20.3 3.7 2.0 1.0 0.7 0.3 1.3 4.3 2.0 -13 3 -4.3 -9.2 23.1 0.0 45.5 -2.27 30.8 23.1
Morgan White Morgan White C 3 5.3 3.3 2.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 1.0 3.3 2.0 -7 3 -2.3 -18.4 40.0 - 66.7 -1.29 44.2 40.0
Leah Keyes Leah Keyes SF 3 16.0 1.3 3.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7 2.0 2.7 -17 3 -5.7 -14.9 16.7 20.0 50.0 -4.28 29.1 25.0
Alva Hägerström Alva Hägerström G 3 10.3 1.0 1.3 1.3 0.3 0.0 2.3 1.7 0.0 -15 3 -5.0 -18.7 20.0 100.0 - -2.44 30.0 30.0
Jazlyn Bowman Jazlyn Bowman G 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

181 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Thompson26% Johnson30% Cortes67% Johnson100% Cortes67% Dauer40% Dauer67% Johnson50% Wilson50%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Thompson21% Njoku18% Thompson67% Hicks50% Toomey43% Njoku50% Dauer100% Wilson36% Keyes50% Dauer57%
Misses: who misses most here

Tiara ThompsonLoghan JohnsonSienna DauerNaylee CortesEbbony WilsonBella ToomeyKimmie HicksPromise NjokuLeah Keyes

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 42-66 63.6 84 Tiara Thompson 26% (22 pts) Loghan Johnson 21% (18 pts) Tiara Thompson 21% (5 misses) Loghan Johnson 17% (4 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 10-49 20.4 20 Loghan Johnson 30% (6 pts) Naylee Cortes 20% (4 pts) Promise Njoku 18% (7 misses) Sienna Dauer 15% (6 misses)
Mid-range left 3-6 50.0 6 Naylee Cortes 67% (4 pts) Tiara Thompson 33% (2 pts) Tiara Thompson 67% (2 misses) Loghan Johnson 33% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 1-5 20.0 2 Loghan Johnson 100% (2 pts) - Kimmie Hicks 50% (2 misses) Naylee Cortes 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 3-10 30.0 6 Naylee Cortes 67% (4 pts) Bella Toomey 33% (2 pts) Bella Toomey 43% (3 misses) Kimmie Hicks 14% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 5-7 71.4 15 Sienna Dauer 40% (6 pts) Ebbony Wilson 20% (3 pts) Promise Njoku 50% (1 misses) Sienna Dauer 50% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 0-1 0.0 0 - - Sienna Dauer 100% (1 misses) -
Above-break 3 left 3-14 21.4 9 Sienna Dauer 67% (6 pts) Tiara Thompson 33% (3 pts) Ebbony Wilson 36% (4 misses) Tiara Thompson 27% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 center 4-10 40.0 12 Loghan Johnson 50% (6 pts) Kimmie Hicks 25% (3 pts) Leah Keyes 50% (3 misses) Loghan Johnson 17% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 right 6-13 46.2 18 Ebbony Wilson 50% (9 pts) Alva Hägerström 17% (3 pts) Sienna Dauer 57% (4 misses) Ebbony Wilson 14% (1 misses)