UNC Greensboro
Model Outputs
2025-2026 latest available
No materialized model snapshot for 2024 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1009 (#255) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1023 (#241) | - |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 1.000 (#16) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 1.000 (#15) | NetEff +69.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 1.000 (#5) | AdjNet +65.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 1.000 (#6) | AdjNet +64.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.972 (#14) | AdjO 79.7 | AdjD 40.5 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | vs | Livingstone | W | 78 - 32 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayde Gamble | - | 1 | 23.0 | 18.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 14.0 | 30 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 54.5 | 60.0 | 75.0 | 0.45 | 70.5 | 68.2 |
| Makiah Asidanya | - | 1 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.67 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
| Nina Horvath | - | 1 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 40.0 | 0 | 0.41 | 71.4 | 71.4 |
| Ayanna Khalfani | - | 1 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 38.7 | 33.3 |
| Kennedy Simpson | - | 1 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 42.9 | 42.9 |
| Isys Grady | - | 1 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Nia Howard | - | 1 | 16.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0.4 | 41.7 | 41.7 |
| Antoniette Emma-Nnopu | - | 1 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 66.5 | 50.0 |
| Kelly Boyle | - | 1 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | -26 | -2.0 | -1.9 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | -0.2 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Joelle Davis | - | 1 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 10 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 0 | 0.16 | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Khalis Cain | - | 1 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 21 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.4 | 38.7 | 33.3 |
| Nasia Powell | - | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.51 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Jailah Clark-Jones | - | 1 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Yacine N'Diaye | - | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| Jay'lin Hastings | - | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG