๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

UL Monroe

2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)

88.5
PPG
69.0
Opp
+19.5
Margin
44.4%
FG%
35.6%
3P%
69.1%
FT%
45.0
RPG
14.5
APG
10.5
TO
70.6
Est. poss./game
69.8
Adj PPG
74.8
Adj Opp PPG
#354
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 621 (returning production + recruiting): last season 759, returning -37, transfers -68, freshmen -34 More โ†’ 611 (#363) Preseason prior 621 (returning production + recruiting): last season 759, returning -37, transfers -68, freshmen -34
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +224 elo More โ†’ 760 (#364) HCA +224 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +223 elo More โ†’ 874 (#364) HCA +223 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -12.3 (#317) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -11.8 (#314) HCA +1.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.183 (#304) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -2.1 More โ†’ 0.293 (#316) AdjNet -2.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -2.1 More โ†’ 0.291 (#315) AdjNet -2.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 74.8 More โ†’ 0.250 (#354) AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 74.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 74.8 More โ†’ 0.321 (#344) AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 74.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.230 (#348) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.242 (#345) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 219 | GP 1 More โ†’ 745 (#364) RD 219 | GP 1
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.112 (#363) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs Central Michigan Chippewas L 78 - 83
2026-11-04 vs Champion Christian Tigers W 99 - 55
2026-11-09 @ Texas A&M Aggies - Preview
2026-11-10 @ TCU Horned Frogs - Preview
2026-11-13 @ Arizona State Sun Devils - Preview
2026-11-14 @ Grand Canyon Lopes - Preview
2026-11-16 vs Dallas Christian Crusaders - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Dayjaun Anderson Dayjaun Anderson G 2 30.5 21.5 4.0 2.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 16.5 11.0 -9 1 -9.0 -9.7 48.5 35.0 57.1 -0.38 59.6 59.1
Quaran McPherson Quaran McPherson G 2 27.0 18.5 4.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 13.5 10.0 2 1 2.0 2.5 40.7 62.5 83.3 0.56 57.3 50.0
Ziyade Ndancky Ziyade Ndancky C 2 23.0 9.5 7.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 7.0 10.5 -2 1 -2.0 -2.6 50.0 0.0 62.5 -0.15 54.2 50.0
Grant Chamberlain Grant Chamberlain F 1 12.0 9.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 - - - - 60.0 60.0 0 - 90.0 90.0
Robert Cowherd Robert Cowherd G 2 11.5 7.5 1.0 0.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 5.5 7.0 -4 1 -4.0 -14.1 36.4 37.5 100.0 -1.48 58.8 50.0
Phillip Tillman Phillip Tillman G 2 28.0 7.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.5 8.0 7.5 6 1 6.0 8.6 25.0 20.0 83.3 0.21 37.6 28.1
Khalil London Khalil London G 1 8.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 - - - - 66.7 50.0 50.0 - 77.3 83.3
Mike White Mike White G 2 20.0 5.5 6.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 11.5 -13 1 -13.0 -28.0 50.0 33.3 100.0 -0.93 61.9 56.2
Lance Carr Lance Carr F 2 24.5 5.5 6.0 1.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 2.5 11.0 -4 1 -4.0 -4.9 80.0 0.0 37.5 -0.21 64.6 80.0
Cooper Nelson Cooper Nelson G 1 8.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 - - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Jean Yvens Lafleur Jean Yvens Lafleur C 2 6.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.5 1.0 3.0 -6 1 -6.0 -44.6 100.0 0 50.0 -0.81 86.8 100.0
Jakeel Registe Jakeel Registe F 1 4.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 - - - - 0.0 0 100.0 - 53.2 0.0
Guillaume Schoentgen Guillaume Schoentgen F 2 8.5 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 5 1 5.0 58.3 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.21 10.2 0.0
Cam Campbell Cam Campbell G 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Martins Adonry Martins Adonry C 1 8.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

133 located field-goal attempts in 2 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Anderson20% Anderson33% Anderson50% White100% McPherson50% White50% Anderson60% Tillman50% Anderson33%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Tillman31% Tillman27% McPherson100% Anderson100% McPherson62% Schoentgen50% Anderson33% Anderson33% Anderson29% Anderson45%
Misses: who misses most here

Dayjaun AndersonQuaran McPhersonMike WhitePhillip TillmanGuillaume Schoentgen

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 30-43 69.8 60 Dayjaun Anderson 20% (12 pts) Ziyade Ndancky 20% (12 pts) Phillip Tillman 31% (4 misses) Ziyade Ndancky 31% (4 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 3-14 21.4 6 Dayjaun Anderson 33% (2 pts) Robert Cowherd 33% (2 pts) Phillip Tillman 27% (3 misses) Quaran McPherson 27% (3 misses)
Mid-range left 4-7 57.1 8 Dayjaun Anderson 50% (4 pts) Quaran McPherson 50% (4 pts) Quaran McPherson 100% (3 misses) -
Mid-range center 1-2 50.0 2 Mike White 100% (2 pts) - Dayjaun Anderson 100% (1 misses) -
Mid-range right 0-8 0.0 0 - - Quaran McPherson 62% (5 misses) Jakeel Registe 12% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 4-6 66.7 12 Quaran McPherson 50% (6 pts) Grant Chamberlain 25% (3 pts) Guillaume Schoentgen 50% (1 misses) Phillip Tillman 50% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 2-8 25.0 6 Mike White 50% (3 pts) Robert Cowherd 50% (3 pts) Dayjaun Anderson 33% (2 misses) Quaran McPherson 33% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 left 10-22 45.5 30 Dayjaun Anderson 60% (18 pts) Quaran McPherson 20% (6 pts) Dayjaun Anderson 33% (4 misses) Grant Chamberlain 17% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 center 2-9 22.2 6 Phillip Tillman 50% (3 pts) Quaran McPherson 50% (3 pts) Dayjaun Anderson 29% (2 misses) Robert Cowherd 29% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 3-14 21.4 9 Dayjaun Anderson 33% (3 pts) Grant Chamberlain 33% (3 pts) Dayjaun Anderson 45% (5 misses) Mike White 18% (2 misses)