๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

UL Monroe

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

67.0
PPG
48.0
Opp
+19.0
Margin
35.7%
FG%
28.9%
3P%
72.6%
FT%
40.3
RPG
13.7
APG
18.7
TO
73.8
Est. poss./game
55.3
Adj PPG
60.7
Adj Opp PPG
#270
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 833 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1030, returning -104, transfers -93, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 817 (#278) Preseason prior 833 (returning production + recruiting): last season 1030, returning -104, transfers -93, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 859 (#289) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 861 (#290) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -5.8 (#214) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ -5.6 (#212) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.146 (#268) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -8.5 More โ†’ 0.291 (#262) AdjNet -8.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -9.9 More โ†’ 0.277 (#269) AdjNet -9.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 55.3 | AdjD 60.7 More โ†’ 0.330 (#270) AdjO 55.3 | AdjD 60.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 55.3 | AdjD 60.7 More โ†’ 0.331 (#268) AdjO 55.3 | AdjD 60.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.296 (#267) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.297 (#267) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 196 | GP 2 More โ†’ 839 (#287) RD 196 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.235 (#279) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ Ohio Bobcats L 46 - 57
2026-11-05 vs Centenary (LA) Ladies W 106 - 26
2026-11-09 vs Central Arkansas Sugar Bears L 49 - 61
2026-11-16 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions - Preview
2026-11-19 vs Sam Houston Bearkats - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions and box-score rates; an unlisted position is inferred from those rates, and missing rates are treated as zero. Legend numbers are each player's share of recorded roster minutes, scaled to five players' regulation minutes; they can differ from minutes per game in the roster below, especially when players miss games or coverage is incomplete. Each position column totals one regulation game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Aiyanna Culver Aiyanna Culver G 3 16.3 14.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.7 8.0 9.3 58 3 19.3 46.6 58.3 52.6 100.0 1.52 82.1 79.2
Kylee Hunt Kylee Hunt G 3 26.3 10.3 2.3 3.3 2.7 0.0 0.7 10.3 7.7 14 3 4.7 7.1 25.8 27.8 83.3 -0.73 42.7 33.9
Kayla Lindsey Kayla Lindsey G 3 21.3 9.0 5.0 1.0 2.0 0.3 2.3 7.7 7.3 23 3 7.7 14.4 47.8 50.0 33.3 -0.9 50.1 52.2
Nevaeh Scott Nevaeh Scott G 3 22.7 8.0 1.7 1.3 0.7 0.0 2.0 9.7 0.0 -9 3 -3.0 -5.4 27.6 23.1 83.3 -2.69 37.9 32.8
Chardel Terrell Chardel Terrell G 1 12.0 6.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 -1.0 13 1 13.0 44.3 33.3 0.0 100.0 -0.57 43.6 33.3
Erin Henry Erin Henry G 3 19.7 5.7 2.3 2.3 3.3 0.0 1.0 5.7 7.0 28 3 9.3 19.3 35.3 16.7 100.0 -1.71 45.3 38.2
Summer Faleafa Summer Faleafa F 3 21.3 3.7 5.3 0.7 0.7 0.0 2.3 5.7 2.3 19 3 6.3 11.8 29.4 0.0 50.0 -1.37 30.8 29.4
Roge'Ne' Hillard Roge'Ne' Hillard C 3 11.0 3.7 4.0 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.3 2.7 6.3 24 3 8.0 29.0 37.5 0 62.5 1.62 47.7 37.5
Lea Nadolny Lea Nadolny G 3 21.3 3.7 2.7 2.7 2.0 0.0 1.7 3.3 6.0 40 3 13.3 24.9 30.0 16.7 66.7 1.64 43.5 35.0
Destini Ward Destini Ward G 3 13.0 3.7 2.3 0.3 1.0 0.3 1.3 3.3 3.0 19 3 6.3 19.5 40.0 40.0 50.0 -0.4 50.6 50.0
Kyla McBride Kyla McBride F 2 7.5 2.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 4.0 -6 2 -3.0 -15.5 50.0 0 75.0 -1.77 66.5 50.0
Amani Williams Amani Williams F 2 6.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 13 2 6.5 43.0 0.0 0 100.0 -0.85 25.8 0.0
Nuria Mucongo Nuria Mucongo NA 3 13.7 0.7 6.0 0.3 2.3 0.3 2.3 1.7 5.7 49 3 16.3 46.8 20.0 0.0 0 3.92 20.0 20.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

185 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Lindsey26% Lindsey33% Scott75% Culver100% Culver25% Culver67% Culver100% Culver62% Culver33% Hunt50%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Lindsey22% Lindsey20% Scott83% Hunt43% Hunt29% Henry43% Culver22% Hunt36% Culver19%
Misses: who misses most here

Aiyanna CulverKayla LindseyKylee HuntNevaeh ScottErin Henry

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 27-54 50.0 54 Kayla Lindsey 26% (14 pts) Erin Henry 19% (10 pts) Kayla Lindsey 22% (6 misses) Erin Henry 19% (5 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 6-26 23.1 12 Kayla Lindsey 33% (4 pts) Aiyanna Culver 17% (2 pts) Kayla Lindsey 20% (4 misses) Kylee Hunt 20% (4 misses)
Mid-range left 4-10 40.0 8 Nevaeh Scott 75% (6 pts) Summer Faleafa 25% (2 pts) Nevaeh Scott 83% (5 misses) Kylee Hunt 17% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 1-1 100.0 2 Aiyanna Culver 100% (2 pts) - - -
Mid-range right 4-11 36.4 8 Aiyanna Culver 25% (2 pts) Lea Nadolny 25% (2 pts) Kylee Hunt 43% (3 misses) Nevaeh Scott 29% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 3-10 30.0 9 Aiyanna Culver 67% (6 pts) Kayla Lindsey 33% (3 pts) Kylee Hunt 29% (2 misses) Destini Ward 14% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 1-8 12.5 3 Aiyanna Culver 100% (3 pts) - Erin Henry 43% (3 misses) Aiyanna Culver 14% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 8-26 30.8 24 Aiyanna Culver 62% (15 pts) Destini Ward 12% (3 pts) Aiyanna Culver 22% (4 misses) Kylee Hunt 22% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 center 6-17 35.3 18 Aiyanna Culver 33% (6 pts) Kayla Lindsey 17% (3 pts) Kylee Hunt 36% (4 misses) Nevaeh Scott 36% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 right 6-22 27.3 18 Kylee Hunt 50% (9 pts) Destini Ward 17% (3 pts) Aiyanna Culver 19% (3 misses) Lea Nadolny 19% (3 misses)