๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

UIC

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

60.3
PPG
70.0
Opp
-9.7
Margin
38.7%
FG%
28.6%
3P%
72.5%
FT%
34.7
RPG
13.0
APG
17.7
TO
67.5
Est. poss./game
57.3
Adj PPG
55.9
Adj Opp PPG
#154
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 989 (returning production + recruiting): last season 907, returning +30, transfers +52, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 1019 (#148) Preseason prior 989 (returning production + recruiting): last season 907, returning +30, transfers +52, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +215 elo More โ†’ 1006 (#152) HCA +215 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +215 elo More โ†’ 1011 (#137) HCA +215 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +9.3 More โ†’ +0.6 (#151) HCA +9.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +9.3 More โ†’ +0.6 (#149) HCA +9.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.227 (#238) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -8.7 More โ†’ 0.408 (#208) AdjNet -8.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -9.0 More โ†’ 0.402 (#209) AdjNet -9.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 57.3 | AdjD 55.9 More โ†’ 0.507 (#154) AdjO 57.3 | AdjD 55.9
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 57.3 | AdjD 55.8 More โ†’ 0.510 (#150) AdjO 57.3 | AdjD 55.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.473 (#175) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.474 (#176) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 198 | GP 2 More โ†’ 993 (#157) RD 198 | GP 2
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Preseason prior only; more training games are needed for a forecast. More โ†’ 0.455 (#174) Preseason prior only; more training games are needed for a forecast.

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 @ Ohio State Buckeyes L 34 - 81
2026-11-05 @ Robert Morris Colonials W 71 - 58
2026-11-08 vs Northwestern Wildcats W 76 - 71
2026-11-11 vs Chicago State Cougars - Preview
2026-11-15 @ Iowa State Cyclones - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Julia Coleman Julia Coleman F 3 27.0 16.3 5.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 2.3 13.7 8.7 -29 2 -14.5 -25.7 46.3 100.0 62.5 0.64 51.0 47.6
Tutu Clayton Tutu Clayton G 3 33.7 12.0 2.3 6.0 2.0 0.3 3.3 10.7 8.7 -23 2 -11.5 -13.9 40.6 16.7 61.5 -1.64 47.7 43.8
Miyah Brown Miyah Brown G 3 32.7 7.7 6.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.7 6.7 7.3 - - - - 45.0 50.0 100.0 - 56.3 55.0
Evyn Carrier Evyn Carrier C 3 18.7 6.0 7.7 1.7 0.7 0.3 1.0 4.3 11.0 -9 2 -4.5 -11.8 46.2 0.0 100.0 -2.17 57.5 46.2
Nevaeh Foster Nevaeh Foster G 3 30.0 5.3 2.7 0.3 1.7 0.0 1.3 7.3 1.3 -18 2 -9.0 -11.2 22.7 26.7 100.0 1.4 35.0 31.8
Aileen Becerril Landeros Aileen Becerril Landeros G 2 11.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.0 1.5 -7 2 -3.5 -12.8 37.5 16.7 100.0 -0.45 53.6 43.8
Salma Khedr Salma Khedr G 3 22.7 4.0 2.0 0.7 0.3 0.7 2.0 5.3 0.3 -18 2 -9.0 -16.3 18.8 0.0 75.0 0.04 30.7 18.8
Magdalena Winter Magdalena Winter C 3 18.0 3.7 3.7 0.3 0.0 1.0 2.3 3.7 2.7 -20 2 -10.0 -19.5 45.5 0 50.0 -1.73 46.3 45.5
Lyla Kahrimanovic Lyla Kahrimanovic G 1 14.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 -9 1 -9.0 -25.2 33.3 33.3 0 -0.66 50.0 50.0
Danyelle London Danyelle London G 3 3.7 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.7 -11 2 -5.5 -59.5 50.0 50.0 0 -2.6 75.0 75.0
Danielle Brooks Danielle Brooks G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mecca Crawford Mecca Crawford F 1 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -6 1 -6.0 -86.2 0 0 0 -1.27 0 0
Aniyah McKenzie Aniyah McKenzie F 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 -0.47 0 0
London Walker-George London Walker-George G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

168 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Coleman42% Coleman37% Landeros50% Carrier50% Khedr50% Brown100% Foster38% Brown100% Clayton50%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Carrier18% Coleman36% Brown50% Clayton75% Coleman40% Landeros33% Foster33% Foster45% Clayton50% Clayton36%
Misses: who misses most here

Julia ColemanTutu ClaytonMiyah BrownNevaeh FosterEvyn CarrierAileen Becerril LanderosSalma Khedr

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 26-37 70.3 52 Julia Coleman 42% (22 pts) Miyah Brown 15% (8 pts) Evyn Carrier 18% (2 misses) Julia Coleman 18% (2 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 19-63 30.2 38 Julia Coleman 37% (14 pts) Tutu Clayton 26% (10 pts) Julia Coleman 36% (16 misses) Salma Khedr 20% (9 misses)
Mid-range left 2-6 33.3 4 Aileen Becerril Landeros 50% (2 pts) Salma Khedr 50% (2 pts) Miyah Brown 50% (2 misses) Evyn Carrier 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 2-6 33.3 4 Evyn Carrier 50% (2 pts) Tutu Clayton 50% (2 pts) Tutu Clayton 75% (3 misses) Julia Coleman 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 2-7 28.6 4 Salma Khedr 50% (2 pts) Tutu Clayton 50% (2 pts) Julia Coleman 40% (2 misses) Tutu Clayton 40% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 0-3 0.0 0 - - Aileen Becerril Landeros 33% (1 misses) Evyn Carrier 33% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 1-7 14.3 3 Miyah Brown 100% (3 pts) - Nevaeh Foster 33% (2 misses) Tutu Clayton 33% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 left 8-19 42.1 24 Nevaeh Foster 38% (9 pts) Miyah Brown 25% (6 pts) Nevaeh Foster 45% (5 misses) Aileen Becerril Landeros 18% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 center 1-5 20.0 3 Miyah Brown 100% (3 pts) - Tutu Clayton 50% (2 misses) Aileen Becerril Landeros 25% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 right 4-15 26.7 12 Tutu Clayton 50% (6 pts) Aileen Becerril Landeros 25% (3 pts) Tutu Clayton 36% (4 misses) Nevaeh Foster 27% (3 misses)