UIC
2026-2027 Team Stats (4 games)
67.0
PPG
65.0
Opp
+2.0
Margin
41.1%
FG%
29.1%
3P%
69.9%
FT%
40.0
RPG
15.5
APG
16.5
TO
69.3
Est. poss./game
59.8
Adj PPG
61.0
Adj Opp PPG
#169
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2026-2027
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1042 (#138) | Preseason prior 989 (returning production + recruiting): last season 907, returning +30, transfers +52, freshmen +0 |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1026 (#139) | HCA +169 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1027 (#139) | HCA +169 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +0.3 (#160) | HCA +1.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +0.4 (#157) | HCA +1.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.515 (#152) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.514 (#154) | AdjNet +1.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.502 (#162) | AdjNet +0.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.476 (#169) | AdjO 59.8 | AdjD 61.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.477 (#169) | AdjO 60.0 | AdjD 61.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.522 (#156) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.522 (#156) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1039 (#133) | RD 167 | GP 4 |
| Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.525 (#147) | Chronological component blend with rest and venue. |
Rank through the season
League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.
Recency Ensemble
Log Adjusted
Elo
Points Off/Def Recency
2026-2027 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | @ | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 34 - 81 |
| 2026-11-05 | @ | Robert Morris Colonials | W | 71 - 58 |
| 2026-11-08 | vs | Northwestern Wildcats | W | 76 - 71 |
| 2026-11-11 | vs | Chicago State Cougars | W | 87 - 50 |
| 2026-11-15 | @ | Iowa State Cyclones | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-19 | vs | Lindenwood Lions | - | Preview |
| 2026-11-21 | vs | Ball State Cardinals | - | Preview |
2026-2027 Roster
Estimated Minutes by Position
Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Julia Coleman
|
F | 4 | 25.0 | 16.2 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 12.2 | 10.5 | -2 | 4 | -0.5 | -0.8 | 53.1 | 100.0 | 63.2 | 0.78 | 56.7 | 54.1 |
Tutu Clayton
|
G | 4 | 30.2 | 12.0 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 10.2 | 10.8 | 12 | 4 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 43.9 | 20.0 | 60.0 | -1.19 | 50.4 | 47.6 |
Nevaeh Foster
|
G | 4 | 28.2 | 8.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 8.8 | 3.8 | 25 | 4 | 6.2 | 8.8 | 31.4 | 32.0 | 80.0 | 2.76 | 45.7 | 42.9 |
Miyah Brown
|
G | 4 | 30.0 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 5.8 | 6.8 | - | - | - | - | 47.8 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 57.6 | 56.5 |
Salma Khedr
|
G | 4 | 23.2 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 3.8 | 14 | 4 | 3.5 | 6.1 | 34.6 | 50.0 | 77.8 | 0.18 | 45.1 | 38.5 |
Evyn Carrier
|
C | 4 | 18.5 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 12.2 | 32 | 4 | 8.0 | 17.3 | 45.0 | 0.0 | 88.9 | 0.09 | 54.3 | 45.0 |
Aileen Becerril Landeros
|
G | 3 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 4.7 | 0.3 | -2 | 3 | -0.7 | -2.0 | 21.4 | 8.3 | 100.0 | -1.65 | 32.6 | 25.0 |
Magdalena Winter
|
C | 4 | 16.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 3.5 | -19 | 4 | -4.8 | -11.5 | 45.5 | 0 | 50.0 | -3.28 | 47.7 | 45.5 |
Lyla Kahrimanovic
|
G | 1 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | -9 | 1 | -9.0 | -25.2 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0 | -1.44 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Mecca Crawford
|
F | 2 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | -13 | 2 | -6.5 | -41.6 | 33.3 | 0 | 75.0 | -2.96 | 52.5 | 33.3 |
Danyelle London
|
G | 4 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | -4 | 4 | -1.0 | -4.9 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 50.0 | -3.0 | 72.7 | 75.0 |
Danielle Brooks
|
G | 1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | -5.0 | -6 | 1 | -6.0 | -18.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.08 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Aniyah McKenzie
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.74 | 0 | 0 |
London Walker-George
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2026-2027 Shot Zones
236 located field-goal attempts in 4 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Julia ColemanTutu ClaytonNevaeh FosterMiyah BrownSalma KhedrEvyn CarrierDanyelle LondonAileen Becerril Landeros
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 40-60 | 66.7 | 80 | Julia Coleman 42% (34 pts) | Evyn Carrier 12% (10 pts) | Evyn Carrier 20% (4 misses) | Salma Khedr 20% (4 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 23-70 | 32.9 | 46 | Julia Coleman 35% (16 pts) | Tutu Clayton 26% (12 pts) | Julia Coleman 34% (16 misses) | Salma Khedr 21% (10 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 3-10 | 30.0 | 6 | Aileen Becerril Landeros 33% (2 pts) | Miyah Brown 33% (2 pts) | Miyah Brown 43% (3 misses) | Evyn Carrier 29% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 3-7 | 42.9 | 6 | Tutu Clayton 67% (4 pts) | Evyn Carrier 33% (2 pts) | Tutu Clayton 75% (3 misses) | Julia Coleman 25% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 5-10 | 50.0 | 10 | Salma Khedr 40% (4 pts) | Tutu Clayton 40% (4 pts) | Julia Coleman 40% (2 misses) | Tutu Clayton 40% (2 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 4-11 | 36.4 | 12 | Nevaeh Foster 50% (6 pts) | Salma Khedr 25% (3 pts) | Nevaeh Foster 29% (2 misses) | Aileen Becerril Landeros 14% (1 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 3-10 | 30.0 | 9 | Danyelle London 67% (6 pts) | Miyah Brown 33% (3 pts) | Tutu Clayton 43% (3 misses) | Nevaeh Foster 29% (2 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 9-26 | 34.6 | 27 | Nevaeh Foster 33% (9 pts) | Miyah Brown 22% (6 pts) | Nevaeh Foster 35% (6 misses) | Aileen Becerril Landeros 29% (5 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 1-7 | 14.3 | 3 | Miyah Brown 100% (3 pts) | - | Aileen Becerril Landeros 33% (2 misses) | Tutu Clayton 33% (2 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 6-25 | 24.0 | 18 | Nevaeh Foster 50% (9 pts) | Tutu Clayton 33% (6 pts) | Nevaeh Foster 32% (6 misses) | Tutu Clayton 21% (4 misses) |