UCLA
2020 Team Stats (4 games)
65.0
PPG
63.8
Opp
+2.6
Margin
48.0%
FG%
40.3%
3P%
71.2%
FT%
31.0
RPG
13.5
APG
15.0
TO
70.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1421 (#52) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1539 (#10) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +38.3 (#23) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.531 (#35) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.849 (#11) | AdjNet +15.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.851 (#11) | AdjNet +15.1 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | vs | California Golden Bears | W | 50 - 40 |
| 2020-01-26 | @ | Oregon Ducks | L | 75 - 96 |
| 2020-01-30 | vs | Colorado Buffaloes | W | 72 - 68 |
| 2020-02-08 | @ | Arizona Wildcats | W | 65 - 52 |
| 2020-02-22 | @ | Colorado Buffaloes | W | 70 - 63 |
| 2020-03-12 | vs | California Golden Bears | - | Preview |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Smith
|
G | 5 | 31.0 | 16.6 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 9.8 | 12.6 | 9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 55.1 | 47.8 | 85.7 | 0.08 | 71.3 | 66.3 |
Jaime Jaquez Jr.
|
- | 5 | 31.0 | 9.4 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 | -14 | -0.9 | -1.1 | 38.5 | 16.7 | 83.3 | 0.48 | 50.1 | 41.0 |
Jake Kyman
|
- | 4 | 16.2 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 46.2 | 100.0 | - | 72.3 | 70.8 |
Josie Hill
|
F | 5 | 25.0 | 8.8 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 5.4 | 10.6 | 40 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 55.6 | 0 | 77.8 | 0.38 | 63.0 | 55.6 |
T. Campbell
|
- | 5 | 27.6 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 6.6 | 6.4 | -40 | -2.5 | -3.4 | 36.4 | 27.3 | 58.3 | -0.2 | 44.4 | 40.9 |
C. Riley
|
F | 5 | 17.2 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 48.8 | 50.0 |
P. Ali
|
G | 3 | 15.3 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 100.0 | 75.0 | - | 76.5 | 75.0 |
D. Singleton
|
- | 5 | 25.8 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 29.2 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 41.7 | 41.7 |
J. Bernard
|
- | 5 | 15.4 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 28.6 | 100.0 | - | 47.0 | 42.9 |
A. Olesinski
|
F | 4 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 62.5 | 62.5 |
R. Stong
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG