UC Santa Barbara Gauchos
2021 Team Stats (3 games)
65.0
PPG
86.0
Opp
-21.0
Margin
38.9%
FG%
44.2%
3P%
67.3%
FT%
28.7
RPG
13.0
APG
18.0
TO
79.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1180 (#95) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1151 (#115) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.6 (#112) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.719 (#93) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-08 | @ | UCLA Bruins | - | Preview |
| 2020-12-09 | @ | UCLA Bruins | L | 45 - 102 |
| 2020-12-27 | vs | UC Irvine Anteaters | L | 60 - 64 |
| 2021-03-10 | @ | UC Irvine Anteaters | L | 90 - 92 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Mole
|
F | 2 | 34.0 | 19.5 | 11.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 20.5 | - | - | - | 56.0 | 54.5 | 83.3 | - | 70.5 | 68.0 |
D. Miller
|
G | 3 | 35.7 | 17.3 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 10.7 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 58.8 | 71.4 | - | 68.1 | 65.6 |
M. Anderson
|
F | 1 | 26.0 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 62.5 | 57.1 | 100.0 | - | 90.1 | 87.5 |
D. Jones
|
G | 3 | 33.7 | 11.3 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 15.3 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 26.1 | 29.4 | 71.4 | - | 34.6 | 31.5 |
B. Anugwom
|
G | 3 | 23.7 | 6.7 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 5.3 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 60.0 | 33.3 | - | 57.7 | 59.4 |
N. Bruening
|
C | 1 | 29.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0 | 60.0 | - | 30.5 | 16.7 |
A. Choice
|
G | 3 | 19.7 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 30.0 | 50.0 | - | 44.0 | 42.3 |
A. Marin
|
G | 3 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 85.7 | - | 54.2 | 37.5 |
L. Lee
|
G | 3 | 22.3 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 100.0 | 25.0 | - | 34.7 | 37.5 |
M. Shulman
|
F | 2 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG