🐻⬇️🏀

UC Riverside

Also known as: UC Riverside Highlanders
Program History

2021 Team Stats (4 games)

69.0
PPG
68.2
Opp
+0.8
Margin
42.5%
FG%
36.6%
3P%
82.2%
FT%
33.0
RPG
13.3
APG
11.5
TO
74.7
Pace

Model Outputs

2020-2021
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1075 (#228) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1200 (#168) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → +20.7 (#217) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.255 (#77) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -25.0 More → 0.056 (#72) NetEff -25.0
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -4.1 More → 0.383 (#70) AdjNet -4.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -4.2 More → 0.382 (#71) AdjNet -4.2

2021 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2020-11-30 @ Fresno State Bulldogs - Preview
2020-12-27 vs Long Beach State Beach - Preview
2021-01-01 @ UC Davis Aggies - Preview
2021-02-05 @ Cal State Fullerton Titans - Preview
2021-02-19 @ UC San Diego Tritons W 81 - 75
2021-03-05 @ Cal State Northridge Matadors W 72 - 68
2021-03-11 vs Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors W 62 - 52
2021-03-12 @ UC Irvine Anteaters L 61 - 78

2021 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
J. Perry J. Perry C 4 26.2 12.2 7.8 1.2 0.8 0.5 1.0 9.8 11.8 - - - 53.8 27.3 100.0 - 60.1 57.7
Z. Pullin Z. Pullin - 4 31.8 12.0 3.5 5.8 0.2 0.0 2.0 11.5 8.0 - - - 39.1 30.8 88.9 - 48.0 43.5
D. Pickett D. Pickett G 4 28.8 11.8 2.8 1.2 2.2 0.0 0.2 7.8 10.0 - - - 48.4 39.1 100.0 - 68.1 62.9
A. Chidom A. Chidom F 3 25.3 11.3 4.7 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.0 12.0 5.3 - - - 38.9 40.0 0.0 - 46.7 47.2
F. Cameron F. Cameron - 4 25.8 8.8 4.5 1.8 0.0 0.2 2.5 6.8 6.0 - - - 40.7 40.0 100.0 - 59.9 55.6
G. Willborn III G. Willborn III G 4 17.0 6.8 1.8 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.2 6.0 3.5 - - - 37.5 50.0 80.0 - 51.5 47.9
W. Tattersall W. Tattersall - 4 19.8 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 3.8 1.5 - - - 26.7 30.8 0 - 40.0 40.0
A. McWilliam A. McWilliam F 4 13.5 2.5 2.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 3.0 - - - 40.0 0.0 66.7 - 55.8 40.0
D. Mading D. Mading F 4 9.5 1.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 2.0 - - - 60.0 33.3 0 - 70.0 70.0
O. Hayes-Brown O. Hayes-Brown F 4 8.8 1.8 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.8 1.2 2.0 - - - 40.0 33.3 50.0 - 51.8 50.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG