🐻⬇️🏀

UC Riverside

Also known as: UC Riverside Highlanders
Program History

2015 Team Stats (2 games)

48.0
PPG
67.7
Opp
-10.7
Margin
32.5%
FG%
10.0%
3P%
68.0%
FT%
30.0
RPG
9.5
APG
10.0
TO
74.0
Pace

Model Outputs

2014-2015
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1181 (#223) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1222 (#212) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → +20.0 (#226) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.001 (#116) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -42.5 More → 0.007 (#115) AdjNet -42.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -42.7 More → 0.006 (#115) AdjNet -42.7

2015 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2014-11-15 vs UC San Diego Tritons W 75 - 52
2014-11-21 @ Utah Utes L 42 - 88
2015-03-12 @ UC Irvine Anteaters L 54 - 63

2015 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Johns T. Johns F 3 30.0 11.7 7.3 2.0 0.0 2.7 2.0 9.7 12.0 - - - 27.6 50.0 0.0 - 56.9 29.3
N. Gruninger N. Gruninger G 3 29.0 11.7 3.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 1.7 5.7 9.7 - - - 35.3 0.0 100.0 - 85.3 35.3
J. Bland J. Bland G 3 31.3 8.7 2.7 1.7 0.3 0.0 1.0 6.3 6.0 - - - 21.1 11.1 0 - 68.4 23.7
S. Thornton S. Thornton F 3 25.3 6.0 1.7 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 4.3 5.3 - - - 46.2 0.0 100.0 - 64.8 46.2
A. Quick A. Quick G 3 14.3 4.3 2.3 1.3 0.7 0.0 1.7 3.3 3.7 - - - 20.0 0.0 66.7 - 51.4 20.0
C. Standifer C. Standifer G 3 11.7 4.0 3.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 3.3 4.3 - - - 30.0 0.0 100.0 - 57.5 30.0
R. Boezeman R. Boezeman F 3 14.7 4.0 2.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 2.0 4.3 - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 100.0 58.3
S. Jones S. Jones G 2 14.5 3.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 3.5 -4 -0.8 -3.5 33.3 0 0 0.24 100.0 33.3
A. Larsson A. Larsson F 3 11.7 2.7 2.7 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.7 4.3 - - - 60.0 0 50.0 - 59.2 60.0
C. Thiero C. Thiero F 2 10.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 1.5 3.5 - - - 66.7 0 0 - 66.7 66.7
C. Gruber C. Gruber F 1 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -2.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
K. Acevado K. Acevado - 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
C. Tang C. Tang G 2 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
B. Wright B. Wright G 2 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG