UC Irvine Anteaters
2024 Team Stats (2 games)
61.5
PPG
63.5
Opp
-2.0
Margin
36.8%
FG%
24.4%
3P%
72.2%
FT%
38.5
RPG
11.5
APG
15.5
TO
81.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1183 (#45) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1254 (#46) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +27.1 (#91) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.913 (#34) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.869 (#28) | AdjNet +16.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.873 (#28) | AdjNet +16.3 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-28 | @ | UC Riverside Highlanders | W | 67 - 52 |
| 2024-03-23 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 56 - 75 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Lee
|
G | 2 | 28.5 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 66 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 38.5 | 30.8 | 66.7 | 0.37 | 47.6 | 46.2 |
N. Parkinson
|
C | 2 | 22.0 | 12.5 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 14.5 | 81 | 8.1 | 19.3 | 76.9 | 0 | 62.5 | 0.86 | 75.7 | 76.9 |
D. Konate
|
G | 2 | 30.0 | 11.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 9.5 | 6.0 | 17 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 52.6 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -0.18 | 57.8 | 55.3 |
N. Tom
|
G | 2 | 32.5 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 84 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 31.2 | 27.3 | 100.0 | 0.83 | 46.2 | 40.6 |
M. Johnson Sidi Baba
|
G | 2 | 22.5 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 90 | 9.0 | 12.3 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 81.8 | 0.68 | 37.8 | 20.0 |
N. Dean
|
F | 2 | 22.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 23 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 66.7 | 0.17 | 39.8 | 35.0 |
A. Scharpf
|
G | 2 | 14.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | -11 | -1.1 | -1.6 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 50.0 | -0.44 | 31.1 | 21.4 |
S. Nahum
|
G | 2 | 16.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | -4.0 | 24 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 16.7 | 25.0 | 0 | -0.07 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
T. Ross
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | -9 | -1.3 | -10.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.29 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Kaupu
|
F | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Ha. Hernandez
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Djoko
|
F | 2 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | -25 | -2.5 | -14.6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.53 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG