UC Irvine Anteaters
2021 Team Stats (4 games)
66.5
PPG
67.5
Opp
-1.0
Margin
37.1%
FG%
34.7%
3P%
70.7%
FT%
35.3
RPG
10.0
APG
14.3
TO
84.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1358 (#17) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1254 (#65) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +27.1 (#92) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.857 (#40) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-27 | @ | UC Santa Barbara Gauchos | W | 64 - 60 |
| 2021-03-10 | vs | UC Santa Barbara Gauchos | W | 92 - 90 |
| 2021-03-12 | vs | Cal Poly Mustangs | W | 68 - 59 |
| 2021-03-13 | @ | UC Davis Aggies | L | 42 - 61 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Webb
|
G | 4 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 8.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 13.8 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 50.0 | 61.5 | - | 47.1 | 40.0 |
K. Williams
|
G | 3 | 31.3 | 15.3 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 12.0 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 46.2 | 90.9 | - | 56.3 | 50.0 |
S. Locandro
|
F | 4 | 30.0 | 9.5 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 11.8 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 36.2 | 0.0 | 57.1 | - | 37.9 | 36.2 |
H. Talbert
|
G | 3 | 33.3 | 8.3 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 6.7 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 42.9 | 66.7 | - | 58.6 | 57.5 |
V. Baker
|
G | 4 | 16.8 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 5.8 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 30.4 | 20.0 | 86.7 | - | 47.3 | 32.6 |
J. Cadee
|
G | 4 | 24.8 | 5.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 6.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 31.8 | 0 | - | 47.9 | 47.9 |
D. Guglielmo
|
G | 4 | 25.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 4.8 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 26.3 | 26.7 | 100.0 | - | 38.6 | 36.8 |
T. Garza
|
C | 4 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 54.9 | 54.5 |
C. Kaupu
|
F | 4 | 7.0 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | -1.8 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 41.4 | 35.0 |
M. Kapinga
|
C | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG