Tusculum
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 859 (#339) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 828 (#340) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.5 (#248) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.080 (#548) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.266 (#284) | NetEff -8.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.148 (#558) | AdjNet -15.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.146 (#558) | AdjNet -14.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.266 (#578) | AdjO 67.3 | AdjD 78.4 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | vs | Lees-McRae | L | 70 - 78 |
| 2024-11-10 | vs | Columbus St. | L | 84 - 97 |
| 2024-11-13 | @ | North Greenville | W | 92 - 75 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | USC Aiken | W | 95 - 78 |
| 2024-11-20 | @ | Carson-Newman | L | 73 - 93 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Wingate | L | 76 - 82 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Newberry | W | 74 - 66 |
| 2024-11-30 | vs | Mars Hill | W | 78 - 74 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Lenoir-Rhyne | L | 78 - 91 |
| 2024-12-11 | vs | Catawba | L | 77 - 88 |
| 2024-12-14 | @ | Coker | L | 54 - 86 |
| 2024-12-18 | @ | Lincoln Memorial | W | 60 - 58 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | ETSU | L | 55 - 103 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Limestone | L | 72 - 77 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Emory & Henry | W | 94 - 81 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Anderson (SC) | L | 63 - 92 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Lincoln Memorial | L | 70 - 79 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Coker | L | 71 - 81 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | UVA Wise | W | 85 - 83 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Lenoir-Rhyne | L | 79 - 82 |
| 2025-01-29 | @ | Limestone | L | 73 - 88 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Catawba | L | 81 - 88 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Emory & Henry | W | 82 - 68 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | Wingate | L | 66 - 77 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Carson-Newman | L | 60 - 89 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Mars Hill | L | 53 - 81 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Newberry | W | 73 - 51 |
| 2025-02-26 | vs | UVA Wise | L | 73 - 88 |
| 2025-03-01 | vs | Anderson (SC) | L | 67 - 88 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ni'kiah Chesterfield | - | 18 | 29.7 | 17.2 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 12.3 | 11.3 | -144 | -6.0 | -7.4 | 53.4 | 40.9 | 74.7 | -0.44 | 59.8 | 55.4 |
| Jalyn Spurlin | - | 26 | 22.1 | 11.1 | 5.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 10.7 | 5.6 | -118 | -6.2 | -9.1 | 40.8 | 0.0 | 65.6 | -1.07 | 45.3 | 40.8 |
| Abbi Douglas | - | 29 | 25.8 | 10.0 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 8.1 | 9.9 | -85 | -2.7 | -3.7 | 42.4 | 21.6 | 72.5 | -0.1 | 51.1 | 44.7 |
| Carleigh Wilson | - | 28 | 24.5 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 6.9 | 8.6 | -89 | -4.0 | -5.6 | 37.0 | 33.9 | 60.6 | -0.04 | 48.9 | 47.4 |
| Zoe Sharpe | - | 27 | 22.4 | 7.1 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 5.3 | -130 | -3.6 | -4.8 | 49.6 | 36.4 | 58.9 | -0.48 | 56.0 | 52.7 |
| Danyell Booker | - | 28 | 14.5 | 6.5 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 5.5 | 4.5 | -34 | -1.6 | -2.1 | 48.1 | 42.9 | 55.4 | 0.19 | 50.9 | 49.0 |
| Jenna Kallenberg | - | 29 | 23.7 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 5.3 | 4.8 | -135 | -5.9 | -8.6 | 38.6 | 36.3 | 81.8 | -0.74 | 54.5 | 53.3 |
| Monique Shim | - | 24 | 13.1 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 1.6 | -54 | -3.0 | -6.5 | 30.8 | 29.8 | 50.0 | -0.28 | 43.1 | 42.8 |
| Josie Horner | - | 25 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0.9 | -101 | -3.6 | -8.2 | 39.0 | 25.0 | 80.0 | -1.23 | 43.4 | 39.8 |
| Angela Gomez | - | 29 | 13.7 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 2.0 | -101 | -3.1 | -4.8 | 38.7 | 10.5 | 54.5 | -0.81 | 41.9 | 40.3 |
| Ema Nagyova | - | 22 | 9.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.4 | -77 | -3.2 | -6.9 | 28.3 | 25.0 | 37.5 | -0.62 | 38.4 | 38.0 |
| Jenna Sparks | - | 15 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | -11 | -1.8 | -4.6 | 35.3 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.12 | 34.8 | 35.3 |
| Trinity Upton | - | 6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 21.6 | 0.0 |
| Artasia Cole | - | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -91 | -2.5 | -2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.28 | 0 | 0 |
| Sariah Johnson | - | 4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 40 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG