Tulsa Golden Hurricane
2024 Team Stats (1 games)
58.0
PPG
102.0
Opp
-44.0
Margin
37.3%
FG%
25.9%
3P%
63.6%
FT%
31.0
RPG
8.0
APG
13.0
TO
76.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1133 (#75) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1192 (#85) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +19.6 (#164) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.644 (#135) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.186 (#76) | AdjNet -12.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.185 (#76) | AdjNet -12.7 |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-26 | @ | Mississippi State Bulldogs | L | 58 - 102 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Poindexter
|
F | 1 | 27.0 | 23.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 22.0 | 6.0 | 36 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 36.4 | 30.0 | 100.0 | -0.18 | 48.4 | 43.2 |
D. Crawford
|
G | 1 | 19.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 36 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.06 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
A. Brown
|
G | 1 | 19.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 154 | 15.4 | 16.2 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 1.17 | 50.9 | 50.0 |
C. Perea
|
F | 1 | 16.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
A. Young
|
G | 1 | 13.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.17 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
M. Cartwright
|
G | 1 | 24.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | -1.0 | 42 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.13 | 37.6 | 25.0 |
K. Gallegos
|
G | 1 | 23.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 45 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.31 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
H. Periman
|
G | 1 | 25.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 58 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.47 | 25.8 | 33.3 |
A. Parmer
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
L. Foutch
|
F | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Lyles
|
G | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
E. Hill
|
G | 1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | -5.0 | 21 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Q. Ikhiuwu
|
F | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG