Texas A&M
2020 Team Stats (5 games)
58.8
PPG
63.0
Opp
-3.9
Margin
36.7%
FG%
27.9%
3P%
68.4%
FT%
31.4
RPG
9.6
APG
14.8
TO
76.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1721 (#5) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1506 (#24) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +37.5 (#30) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.112 (#93) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.117 (#70) | NetEff -17.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.144 (#103) | AdjNet -15.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.141 (#103) | AdjNet -15.6 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | vs | UL Monroe Warhawks | W | 63 - 57 |
| 2019-11-15 | vs | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 49 - 79 |
| 2019-11-20 | vs | Troy Trojans | W | 56 - 52 |
| 2019-11-28 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 51 - 62 |
| 2020-01-07 | vs | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 57 - 47 |
| 2020-02-25 | vs | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 60 - 69 |
| 2020-03-04 | @ | Auburn Tigers | W | 78 - 75 |
| 2020-03-12 | vs | Missouri Tigers | - | Preview |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Nebo
|
F | 7 | 26.7 | 13.1 | 5.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 6.3 | 14.6 | - | - | - | 65.9 | 0 | 64.3 | - | 73.6 | 65.9 |
W. Mitchell
|
G | 7 | 29.7 | 11.6 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 10.7 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 34.7 | 30.0 | 80.0 | - | 48.3 | 42.7 |
S. Flagg
|
G | 7 | 32.7 | 9.9 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 8.0 | 6.3 | - | - | - | 39.3 | 37.0 | 73.3 | - | 55.1 | 48.2 |
J. Chandler
|
G | 7 | 24.3 | 8.4 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 27.5 | 22.7 | 93.8 | - | 62.7 | 33.8 |
A. Gordon
|
- | 5 | 24.8 | 7.0 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.2 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 36.4 | 33.3 | - | 64.1 | 38.5 |
Q. Jackson
|
- | 6 | 24.8 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 5.0 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 26.7 | 7.1 | 100.0 | - | 50.2 | 28.3 |
M. French
|
G | 6 | 14.5 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 28.6 | 62.5 | - | 58.5 | 54.5 |
Emanuel Miller
|
- | 7 | 20.4 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 38.3 | 25.0 |
Y. Gultekin
|
F | 5 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.4 | -0.4 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 33.6 | 28.6 |
Jonathan Aku
|
- | 7 | 9.9 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 71.7 | 25.0 |
L. McGhee
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Z. Walker
|
G | 3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG