Tennessee Tech
Also known as: Tennessee Tech
Program History
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.990 (#121) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.980 (#99) | AdjNet +33.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.981 (#105) | AdjNet +33.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.891 (#87) | AdjO 79.1 | AdjD 55.9 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | vs | Emory & Henry | W | 82 - 54 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Larry | - | 1 | 29.0 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 87.5 | - | 54.8 | 41.7 |
| Reghan Grimes | - | 1 | 29.0 | 16.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 14.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 53.8 | 50.0 |
| Taris Thornton | - | 1 | 22.0 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 63.6 | 50.0 | 25.0 | - | 62.7 | 68.2 |
| Peyton Carter | - | 1 | 37.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0 | - | 68.8 | 68.8 |
| Amelia Pfeiffer | - | 1 | 16.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 82.0 | 75.0 |
| Anna Walker | - | 1 | 16.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 44 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 22.2 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.26 | 27.8 | 27.8 |
| Keeley Carter | - | 1 | 28.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 107 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.3 | 31.6 | 20.0 |
| Maddy Newman | - | 1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Angelika Girgenson | - | 1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
| Megan Aulbert | - | 1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.18 | 56.8 | 0 |
| Maddy Saracco | - | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG