Tennessee Lady Volunteers
2024 Team Stats (14 games)
74.9
PPG
73.7
Opp
+1.2
Margin
41.3%
FG%
28.8%
3P%
71.9%
FT%
44.4
RPG
13.1
APG
15.0
TO
89.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1303 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1335 (#21) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +52.6 (#9) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.923 (#25) | - |
2024 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | vs | Florida A&M Rattlers | W | 93 - 64 |
| 2023-11-09 | @ | Florida State Seminoles | L | 91 - 92 |
| 2023-11-13 | vs | Memphis Tigers | W | 84 - 74 |
| 2023-11-19 | vs | Troy Trojans | W | 100 - 73 |
| 2023-11-23 | vs | Indiana Hoosiers | L | 57 - 71 |
| 2023-11-25 | @ | Oklahoma Sooners | W | 76 - 73 |
| 2023-11-29 | vs | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 69 - 74 |
| 2023-12-03 | vs | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 58 - 78 |
| 2024-02-15 | vs | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 55 - 66 |
| 2024-02-25 | vs | LSU Tigers | L | 60 - 75 |
| 2024-03-03 | @ | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 68 - 76 |
| 2024-03-09 | @ | South Carolina Gamecocks | L | 73 - 74 |
| 2024-03-23 | vs | Green Bay Phoenix | W | 92 - 63 |
| 2024-03-25 | @ | NC State Wolfpack | L | 72 - 79 |
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. Jackson
|
- | 8 | 34.9 | 23.6 | 9.5 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 19.2 | 15.5 | 20 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 48.1 | 34.6 | 80.0 | 0.23 | 55.1 | 51.0 |
S. Puckett
|
G | 14 | 27.6 | 11.2 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 9.4 | 7.3 | 82 | 6.8 | 8.8 | 44.7 | 36.2 | 81.5 | 0.67 | 54.6 | 51.1 |
J. Spear
|
G | 14 | 29.3 | 10.8 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 49 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 35.4 | 30.0 | 85.2 | 0.34 | 47.5 | 43.5 |
J. Powell
|
G | 13 | 30.1 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 8.8 | 7.4 | 102 | 8.5 | 10.3 | 35.7 | 28.9 | 71.2 | 1.24 | 47.9 | 40.4 |
D. Wells
|
G | 8 | 24.1 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 7.2 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 36.2 | 11.1 | 80.0 | - | 44.9 | 37.9 |
K. Striplin
|
F | 14 | 13.6 | 6.7 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 5.0 | -31 | -2.6 | -6.6 | 53.1 | 29.4 | 70.0 | -0.48 | 60.9 | 57.0 |
J. Hollingshead
|
F | 14 | 20.3 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 90 | 7.5 | 13.8 | 45.0 | 0.0 | 68.8 | 0.65 | 51.3 | 45.0 |
T. Darby
|
G | 14 | 21.1 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 45 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 30.1 | 28.3 | 37.5 | 0.37 | 40.5 | 40.4 |
T. Key
|
C | 13 | 13.0 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 5.8 | 32 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 61.5 | 0 | 43.8 | 0.45 | 59.7 | 61.5 |
K. Wynn
|
G | 14 | 10.6 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 42 | 3.5 | 9.7 | 35.0 | 28.6 | 68.2 | 0.03 | 45.3 | 37.5 |
E. Darby
|
G | 6 | 6.2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 32 | 4.6 | 20.9 | 33.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 0.3 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
A. Strickland
|
G | 7 | 6.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 4 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 22.2 | 16.7 | 50.0 | -0.02 | 32.5 | 27.8 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG