Tennessee Lady Volunteers
2021 Team Stats (9 games)
75.6
PPG
64.9
Opp
+7.0
Margin
46.6%
FG%
34.2%
3P%
69.4%
FT%
45.4
RPG
15.4
APG
14.4
TO
85.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1316 (#34) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1383 (#22) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +48.3 (#12) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.878 (#32) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-13 | @ | Texas Longhorns | - | Preview |
| 2020-12-17 | @ | Indiana Hoosiers | W | 66 - 58 |
| 2020-12-31 | @ | Texas A&M Aggies | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-07 | vs | Arkansas Razorbacks | W | 88 - 73 |
| 2021-01-17 | @ | Alabama Crimson Tide | W | 82 - 56 |
| 2021-01-21 | vs | UConn Huskies | L | 61 - 67 |
| 2021-01-24 | vs | Kentucky Wildcats | W | 70 - 53 |
| 2021-01-28 | vs | Ole Miss Rebels | W | 68 - 67 |
| 2021-01-31 | vs | Florida Gators | W | 79 - 65 |
| 2021-02-04 | @ | Mississippi State Bulldogs | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-11 | @ | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 56 - 71 |
| 2021-02-14 | @ | Texas A&M Aggies | L | 70 - 80 |
| 2021-02-16 | @ | Mississippi State Bulldogs | - | Preview |
| 2021-02-18 | vs | South Carolina Gamecocks | W | 75 - 67 |
| 2021-02-21 | @ | Georgia Lady Bulldogs | L | 55 - 57 |
| 2021-02-25 | @ | Missouri Tigers | W | 78 - 73 |
| 2021-02-28 | vs | Auburn Tigers | W | 88 - 54 |
| 2021-03-21 | vs | Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders | W | 87 - 62 |
| 2021-03-23 | vs | Michigan Wolverines | L | 55 - 70 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rennia Davis
|
G | 14 | 34.6 | 20.2 | 9.8 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 15.4 | 17.1 | - | - | - | 50.2 | 27.5 | 89.8 | - | 58.7 | 53.5 |
R. Burrell
|
- | 15 | 34.3 | 17.9 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 14.7 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 47.7 | 39.0 | 78.3 | - | 56.0 | 53.0 |
T. Key
|
C | 15 | 26.5 | 9.9 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 6.8 | 12.2 | - | - | - | 58.8 | 0 | 70.7 | - | 62.1 | 58.8 |
J. Horston
|
- | 15 | 28.6 | 8.3 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 9.9 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 32.2 | 21.4 | 67.6 | - | 38.1 | 34.2 |
K. Kushkituah
|
C | 15 | 26.2 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 7.0 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 45.7 | 0 | 40.0 | - | 45.7 | 45.7 |
J. Walker
|
G | 15 | 23.3 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 5.6 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 25.7 | 54.5 | - | 36.8 | 33.9 |
M. Suarez
|
F | 12 | 14.2 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 37.8 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 44.9 | 44.6 |
T. Darby
|
G | 6 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 44.4 | 0 | - | 60.0 | 60.0 |
D. Salary
|
G | 14 | 11.1 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 28.6 | 33.3 | - | 36.7 | 36.7 |
E. Saunders
|
F | 9 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 38.1 | 28.6 |
J. Rennie
|
G | 7 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | -0.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG