🐻⬇️🏀

Tenn. Wesleyan

Season: 2026 2024 2023 2020 2019 2016 2015
Also known as: Tenn. Wesleyan
Program History

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 972 (#264) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 949 (#345) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More → 979 (#405) HCA +95 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -6.8 (#423) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.070 (#544) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -10.0 More → 0.241 (#525) AdjNet -10.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -8.6 More → 0.267 (#513) AdjNet -8.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 74.2 | AdjD 81.8 More → 0.333 (#523) AdjO 74.2 | AdjD 81.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 75.9 | AdjD 78.8 More → 0.434 (#415) AdjO 75.9 | AdjD 78.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.392 (#406) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.395 (#404) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 263 | GP 1 More → 937 (#292) RD 263 | GP 1

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-12-31 @ Carson-Newman L 72 - 92

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Nichaune Jones - 1 30.3 16.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 15.0 10.0 0 0.0 0.0 40.0 30.0 50.0 0.05 50.4 50.0
Armando Cuardado - 1 22.7 12.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 7.0 16.0 - - - 85.7 0 0 - 85.7 85.7
Peyton West - 1 14.6 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 8.0 4.0 - - - 50.0 100.0 50.0 - 56.3 56.2
Charles Neverdon - 1 30.9 9.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 13.0 3.0 - - - 23.1 37.5 0 - 34.6 34.6
Kariden Hardick - 1 9.9 6.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 11.0 - - - 50.0 0 66.7 - 64.7 50.0
Stratton Lovvorn - 1 21.9 6.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 10.0 2.0 - - - 20.0 0.0 100.0 - 27.6 20.0
Willie Forman - 1 10.1 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 - - - 33.3 0.0 100.0 - 51.5 33.3
Ty Hurst - 1 16.6 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Ty Runyan - 1 27.3 3.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 - - - 14.3 0.0 50.0 - 19.0 14.3
Jay Reed - 1 1.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5 0.3 12.4 100.0 0 0 -1.34 100.0 100.0
Zhaelin Callahan - 1 11.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG