Temple Owls
2023 Team Stats (2 games)
66.0
PPG
70.7
Opp
-10.4
Margin
38.2%
FG%
43.2%
3P%
50.0%
FT%
35.5
RPG
14.0
APG
12.5
TO
83.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 998 (#209) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1103 (#151) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +23.7 (#119) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.420 (#212) | - |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-07 | @ | Princeton Tigers | L | 49 - 67 |
| 2022-11-20 | vs | Villanova Wildcats | L | 71 - 74 |
| 2023-03-06 | @ | Wichita State Shockers | L | 61 - 71 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Nelson
|
G | 2 | 40.0 | 21.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 16.5 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 43.8 | 63.6 | - | 55.5 | 53.0 |
T. Gary
|
G | 2 | 37.5 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 11.5 | 9.5 | - | - | - | 52.2 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 73.9 | 73.9 |
T. East
|
G | 2 | 30.5 | 11.5 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 15.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 32.3 | 0.0 | 60.0 | - | 34.6 | 32.3 |
B. Garner
|
F | 2 | 20.5 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 71.4 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 74.2 | 71.4 |
J. Clinton
|
G | 1 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 10.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 27.6 | 30.0 |
I. Pipe
|
F | 2 | 22.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 35.0 | 35.0 |
C. Perea
|
F | 2 | 14.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 41.7 | 41.7 |
J. Holmes
|
G | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 20.5 | 25.0 |
D. Solis
|
C | 2 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M. Waleed
|
G | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG