Tampa
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1068 (#77) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1108 (#72) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +11.0 (#66) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.552 (#314) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.688 (#123) | NetEff +7.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.781 (#245) | AdjNet +11.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.784 (#246) | AdjNet +11.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.693 (#237) | AdjO 87.2 | AdjD 78.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | @ | Allen | W | 75 - 64 |
| 2024-11-09 | @ | Benedict | W | 100 - 79 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Claflin | W | 96 - 76 |
| 2024-11-25 | vs | P.R.-Mayaguez | W | 127 - 74 |
| 2024-11-29 | vs | P.R.-Mayaguez | W | 109 - 60 |
| 2024-11-30 | vs | Minn.-Crookston | W | 103 - 96 |
| 2024-12-03 | vs | Fla. Southern | L | 81 - 82 |
| 2024-12-07 | @ | Saint Leo | W | 90 - 87 |
| 2024-12-14 | vs | Lynn | L | 69 - 91 |
| 2024-12-20 | vs | Roberts Wesleyan | W | 90 - 67 |
| 2024-12-21 | vs | Flagler | W | 78 - 70 |
| 2025-01-01 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 88 - 114 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Rollins | W | 99 - 92 |
| 2025-01-08 | @ | Eckerd | L | 64 - 66 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Embry-Riddle (FL) | L | 89 - 96 |
| 2025-01-15 | vs | Florida Tech | W | 100 - 66 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | Palm Beach Atl. | W | 97 - 88 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Barry | W | 101 - 96 |
| 2025-01-25 | vs | Saint Leo | W | 95 - 86 |
| 2025-01-29 | @ | Fla. Southern | L | 125 - 129 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Lynn | L | 69 - 84 |
| 2025-02-05 | vs | Nova Southeastern | L | 66 - 100 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Rollins | L | 78 - 95 |
| 2025-02-12 | vs | Eckerd | W | 85 - 69 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Embry-Riddle (FL) | W | 73 - 70 |
| 2025-02-19 | @ | Florida Tech | W | 95 - 83 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Palm Beach Atl. | W | 64 - 60 |
| 2025-02-26 | vs | Barry | W | 97 - 62 |
| 2025-03-04 | @ | Embry-Riddle (FL) | W | 90 - 73 |
| 2025-03-06 | @ | Nova Southeastern | L | 80 - 104 |
| 2025-03-15 | @ | UAH | L | 88 - 99 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyson Leitao | - | 31 | 28.1 | 14.4 | 11.0 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 10.5 | 16.5 | 19 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 46.5 | 34.2 | 73.0 | 1.29 | 55.1 | 48.5 |
| Amarion Nimmers | - | 31 | 26.3 | 14.2 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 12.7 | 6.5 | -54 | -2.0 | -6.6 | 41.7 | 36.8 | 56.2 | 0.19 | 52.4 | 51.5 |
| Bryan Williams | - | 25 | 21.5 | 14.1 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 11.8 | 7.6 | 12 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 41.0 | 34.9 | 72.0 | 0.44 | 51.9 | 47.5 |
| Trey Lane | - | 27 | 26.7 | 12.4 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 11.0 | 9.4 | 9 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 40.2 | 33.3 | 83.7 | 0.52 | 52.9 | 49.8 |
| Ryan Blount | - | 31 | 22.6 | 12.0 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 209 | 6.1 | 34.0 | 42.6 | 41.1 | 71.7 | 0.36 | 57.0 | 55.1 |
| Kaden Froebe | - | 31 | 28.5 | 10.5 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 8.2 | 11.0 | 73 | 2.8 | 7.9 | 44.1 | 35.7 | 65.5 | 1.64 | 53.9 | 50.0 |
| B.J. Schaeffer | - | 29 | 9.1 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 2.6 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 44.2 | 11.8 | 51.4 | 0.4 | 46.5 | 45.0 |
| De'Andre Harvey | - | 29 | 8.0 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 1.1 | -3 | -0.3 | -3.3 | 25.0 | 22.8 | 83.3 | -0.32 | 34.6 | 32.7 |
| Zach Johnson | - | 28 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 12 | 1.5 | 34.9 | 45.2 | 43.2 | 60.0 | -0.7 | 64.5 | 64.3 |
| Kyler Lamb | - | 29 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.2 | -9 | -0.3 | -6.6 | 48.9 | 16.7 | 64.7 | -0.28 | 53.2 | 50.0 |
| Ian Higdon | - | 29 | 10.8 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 25 | 0.8 | 10.0 | 54.1 | 0 | 66.7 | -0.99 | 56.8 | 54.1 |
| Cole Gingeleski | - | 30 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | -49 | -2.2 | -50.7 | 42.4 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -0.32 | 46.0 | 43.9 |
| Grady Schwartz | - | 27 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | -27 | -1.8 | -98.3 | 42.1 | 0.0 | 76.9 | -0.83 | 52.6 | 42.1 |
| Isaiah Young | - | 28 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 25 | 2.5 | 81.7 | 38.5 | 41.7 | 25.0 | -0.75 | 54.2 | 57.7 |
| Jaxon Toney | - | 28 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36.8 | 10.0 | 0.0 | -1.36 | 36.1 | 39.5 |
| Drew Knuppel | - | 18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG