TCU Horned Frogs
2009 Team Stats (6 games)
66.8
PPG
64.0
Opp
+5.2
Margin
39.1%
FG%
37.8%
3P%
75.2%
FT%
32.2
RPG
13.2
APG
0.0
TO
67.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1353 (#31) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1243 (#57) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.9 (#47) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.749 (#70) | - |
2009 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-11-14 | vs | Maryland Terrapins | W | 80 - 68 |
| 2008-11-16 | vs | UTSA Roadrunners | W | 73 - 60 |
| 2008-11-20 | vs | UT Arlington Mavericks | W | 70 - 45 |
| 2008-11-23 | vs | Sam Houston Bearkats | W | 89 - 75 |
| 2008-11-25 | vs | Houston Cougars | W | 91 - 72 |
| 2008-11-27 | @ | Boston College Eagles | L | 68 - 77 |
| 2008-11-28 | vs | Eastern Michigan Eagles | W | 71 - 55 |
| 2008-12-04 | @ | Fresno State Bulldogs | L | 71 - 75 |
| 2008-12-06 | vs | Saint Louis Billikens | W | 73 - 59 |
| 2008-12-07 | @ | California Golden Bears | W | 82 - 73 |
| 2008-12-14 | @ | Oklahoma State Cowgirls | L | 80 - 85 |
| 2008-12-21 | @ | Texas A&M Aggies | L | 50 - 64 |
| 2008-12-30 | vs | SMU Mustangs | L | 75 - 79 |
| 2009-01-07 | @ | Colorado State Rams | W | 74 - 53 |
| 2009-01-10 | @ | UNLV Lady Rebels | W | 66 - 61 |
| 2009-01-13 | vs | BYU Cougars | L | 46 - 62 |
| 2009-01-17 | vs | Air Force Falcons | W | 79 - 43 |
| 2009-01-21 | @ | Wyoming Cowgirls | W | 81 - 78 |
| 2009-01-25 | @ | New Mexico Lobos | L | 63 - 75 |
| 2009-01-28 | vs | San Diego State Aztecs | W | 65 - 62 |
| 2009-02-04 | @ | Utah Utes | L | 63 - 73 |
| 2009-02-07 | vs | Colorado State Rams | W | 71 - 59 |
| 2009-02-10 | vs | UNLV Lady Rebels | W | 75 - 46 |
| 2009-02-14 | @ | BYU Cougars | W | 75 - 55 |
| 2009-02-18 | @ | Air Force Falcons | W | 67 - 57 |
| 2009-02-21 | vs | Wyoming Cowgirls | W | 60 - 47 |
| 2009-02-25 | vs | New Mexico Lobos | W | 41 - 38 |
| 2009-02-28 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 63 - 68 |
| 2009-03-07 | vs | Utah Utes | W | 53 - 47 |
| 2009-03-11 | vs | UNLV Lady Rebels | L | 75 - 84 |
| 2009-03-22 | @ | South Dakota State Jackrabbits | L | 55 - 90 |
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Langford
|
- | 2 | 29.0 | 20.0 | 9.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 18.5 | - | - | - | 61.9 | 0.0 | 82.4 | - | 70.2 | 61.9 |
T. LaFleur
|
G | 6 | 0.0 | 16.7 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 15.2 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 50.0 | 81.2 | - | 51.0 | 47.8 |
H. Sverrisdottir
|
G | 6 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 8.7 | 5.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 5.0 | 10.2 | 15.7 | - | - | - | 49.2 | 52.9 | 75.0 | - | 61.4 | 56.6 |
R. Moss
|
- | 2 | 28.0 | 14.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 9.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 57.9 | 33.3 | 62.5 | - | 64.4 | 63.2 |
E. Ruzgas
|
- | 2 | 34.0 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 36.4 | 50.0 | - | 61.2 | 61.5 |
T. Dials
|
F-C | 2 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 9.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 26.3 | 33.3 | 66.7 | - | 37.0 | 31.6 |
E. Carter
|
F | 4 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 9.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 15.4 | 80.0 | - | 39.3 | 36.1 |
Z. Buljan
|
- | 2 | 19.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 50.4 | 46.4 |
R. Rentschler
|
F | 4 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 7.5 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 41.7 | 100.0 | - | 41.5 | 38.3 |
M. Garoutte
|
C | 5 | 0.0 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 45.0 | 0 | 90.0 | - | 55.3 | 45.0 |
K. Mitchem
|
- | 2 | 22.5 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
L. Lancon
|
- | 1 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 34.0 | 20.0 |
C. Ford
|
- | 2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 23.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 22.3 | 23.1 |
J. Ebie
|
- | 2 | 26.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 28.5 | 14.3 |
J. Ortiz
|
- | 2 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 69.4 | 50.0 |
K. Butler
|
- | 2 | 19.5 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 41.0 | 25.0 |
M. Younger
|
C | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
A.J. Siebert
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
K. Rose
|
- | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG