Swarthmore
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 862 (#449) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 874 (#394) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -5.0 (#235) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.384 (#502) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.577 (#207) | NetEff +2.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.471 (#390) | AdjNet -1.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.456 (#390) | AdjNet -1.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.466 (#389) | AdjO 56.8 | AdjD 58.3 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Babson | L | 47 - 52 |
| 2024-11-09 | @ | MIT | L | 48 - 56 |
| 2024-11-13 | vs | Widener | W | 59 - 53 |
| 2024-11-16 | @ | Mansfield | L | 65 - 68 |
| 2024-11-19 | vs | Arcadia | L | 47 - 63 |
| 2024-11-21 | vs | Rosemont | W | 93 - 27 |
| 2024-11-26 | vs | Gwynedd Mercy | W | 62 - 45 |
| 2024-12-04 | @ | Franklin & Marshall | L | 57 - 63 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Washington Col. | L | 36 - 52 |
| 2025-01-02 | @ | TCNJ | L | 38 - 48 |
| 2025-01-04 | vs | Mary Washington | W | 54 - 37 |
| 2025-01-08 | vs | Johns Hopkins | L | 45 - 58 |
| 2025-01-11 | @ | Dickinson | L | 47 - 55 |
| 2025-01-15 | @ | Muhlenberg | W | 71 - 41 |
| 2025-01-18 | vs | McDaniel | L | 33 - 53 |
| 2025-01-22 | @ | Bryn Mawr | W | 72 - 39 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | Gettysburg | L | 35 - 71 |
| 2025-01-29 | vs | Ursinus | L | 43 - 72 |
| 2025-02-01 | vs | Muhlenberg | L | 45 - 51 |
| 2025-02-05 | @ | Haverford | L | 37 - 51 |
| 2025-02-08 | @ | Salisbury | W | 58 - 52 |
| 2025-02-12 | @ | Washington Col. | L | 37 - 43 |
| 2025-02-15 | @ | Ursinus | L | 59 - 75 |
| 2025-02-19 | vs | Bryn Mawr | W | 67 - 34 |
| 2025-02-22 | vs | Haverford | L | 45 - 53 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alyssa Hayashi | - | 25 | 31.4 | 10.5 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 11.5 | 6.3 | 31 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 36.1 | 20.0 | 66.1 | 0.09 | 41.9 | 38.9 |
| Anna Hansson | - | 24 | 27.0 | 9.5 | 6.8 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 10.2 | 34 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 49.2 | 0 | 61.9 | 0.65 | 52.8 | 49.2 |
| Norah Wingfield | - | 25 | 18.2 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 7.2 | 2.8 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 36.1 | 37.2 | 80.0 | -0.23 | 42.3 | 40.6 |
| Katelyn Becker | - | 25 | 25.0 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 45 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 37.0 | 38.9 | 90.0 | 0.62 | 51.4 | 45.8 |
| Carly Murphy | - | 23 | 15.1 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 14 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 33.1 | 34.2 | 82.6 | 0.16 | 41.7 | 37.9 |
| Rebekah Gendler | - | 25 | 16.3 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 23 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 32.4 | 23.3 | 69.2 | 0.24 | 41.1 | 39.0 |
| Lillian Czub | - | 25 | 11.8 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 26.4 | 23.5 | 77.4 | 0.08 | 36.3 | 28.6 |
| Raven Richardson | - | 24 | 15.8 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 65 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 29.6 | 33.3 | 44.4 | 0.25 | 30.8 | 30.1 |
| Vanessa Amsinger | - | 24 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 12 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 25.4 | 19.4 | 75.0 | 0.06 | 35.8 | 31.4 |
| Jasmine Branda | - | 25 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 7 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 26.0 | 29.4 | 62.5 | 0.07 | 38.3 | 36.0 |
| Jordana Sampson | - | 24 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 16 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 37.0 | 16.7 | 50.0 | 0.18 | 40.5 | 38.9 |
| Carolina Lopez | - | 25 | 11.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 14 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 21.6 | 20.0 | 42.9 | -0.01 | 24.0 | 22.5 |
| Elisa Fiore | - | 21 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 16 | 1.1 | 5.7 | 31.2 | 20.0 | 0 | 0.14 | 34.4 | 34.4 |
| Kaylah Jacques | - | 20 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 7 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 18.2 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.23 | 23.5 | 18.2 |
| Nina Sablan | - | 20 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | -0.1 | -25 | -1.4 | -6.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.38 | 14.1 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG