Stonehill Skyhawks
Also known as: Stonehill Skyhawks
Program History
2023 Team Stats (18 games)
63.5
PPG
63.7
Opp
+0.0
Margin
43.2%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
76.5%
FT%
30.9
RPG
12.3
APG
13.0
TO
71.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 969 (#415) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 932 (#580) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +11.4 (#380) | HCA +2.8 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.399 (#228) | NetEff -3.5 |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-12 | @ | Army Black Knights | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2022-11-22 | @ | Fordham Rams | L | 60 - 71 |
| 2022-11-27 | @ | UMass Lowell River Hawks | L | 59 - 73 |
| 2022-11-30 | vs | Eastern Nazarene Lions | W | 92 - 45 |
| 2022-12-03 | @ | Binghamton Bearcats | W | 69 - 66 |
| 2022-12-19 | @ | Bradley Braves | L | 50 - 79 |
| 2023-01-05 | vs | Wagner Seahawks | W | 62 - 58 |
| 2023-01-07 | vs | Central Connecticut Blue Devils | W | 51 - 49 |
| 2023-01-14 | vs | Merrimack Warriors | L | 47 - 59 |
| 2023-01-16 | vs | Fairleigh Dickinson Knights | L | 57 - 65 |
| 2023-01-20 | @ | Long Island University Sharks | W | 73 - 66 |
| 2023-01-22 | @ | Fairleigh Dickinson Knights | W | 70 - 59 |
| 2023-01-25 | @ | Hartford Hawks | L | 56 - 73 |
| 2023-01-28 | vs | Sacred Heart Pioneers | W | 82 - 81 |
| 2023-02-02 | vs | Saint Francis Red Flash | W | 74 - 61 |
| 2023-02-04 | @ | St. Francis Brooklyn Terriers | W | 65 - 59 |
| 2023-02-09 | @ | Merrimack Warriors | L | 43 - 56 |
| 2023-02-16 | vs | Long Island University Sharks | W | 75 - 60 |
| 2023-02-23 | @ | Wagner Seahawks | L | 44 - 54 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. Zegarowski
|
- | 19 | 33.1 | 13.5 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 7.4 | 11.3 | - | - | - | 46.8 | 40.5 | 91.7 | - | 81.9 | 58.9 |
A. Sims
|
- | 18 | 32.7 | 13.5 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 45.9 | 30.4 | 69.8 | 1.21 | 61.5 | 47.9 |
I. Burnett
|
- | 19 | 31.9 | 11.0 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 6.9 | 12.2 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 30.8 | 86.7 | - | 66.0 | 50.0 |
S. Johnson
|
- | 19 | 20.6 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 6.0 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 35.1 | 32.9 | 66.7 | - | 54.1 | 46.5 |
J. Mack
|
- | 17 | 22.8 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 32.4 | 68.8 | - | 60.0 | 51.4 |
T. Stone
|
- | 19 | 18.9 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 40.5 | 25.9 | 76.5 | - | 57.7 | 45.3 |
E. Meuser
|
- | 6 | 12.8 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 6.2 | -5 | -0.5 | -1.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.2 | 181.7 | 66.7 |
C. Bergan
|
- | 19 | 18.9 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 5.6 | - | - | - | 35.9 | 28.6 | 75.0 | - | 64.6 | 41.0 |
C. Melis
|
- | 16 | 14.6 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 56.0 | 57.1 |
C. Stinson
|
- | 9 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 41 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 1.41 | 178.6 | 33.3 |
J. O'Reilly III
|
- | 4 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.71 | 350.0 | 0.0 |
N. McGill
|
- | 14 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 25.0 | - | 253.6 | 150.0 |
W. Rywolt
|
- | 3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Marquardt
|
- | 4 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG