St. Lawrence
Model Outputs
2024-2025
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1054 (#126) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1078 (#129) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +1.5 (#170) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.606 (#401) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.673 (#172) | NetEff +5.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.495 (#383) | AdjNet -0.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.487 (#383) | AdjNet -0.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.465 (#390) | AdjO 61.6 | AdjD 63.1 |
2025 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-08 | vs | Oswego St. | W | 62 - 44 |
| 2024-11-12 | vs | SUNY Potsdam | W | 60 - 55 |
| 2024-11-16 | vs | Clarkson | W | 58 - 44 |
| 2024-11-19 | @ | Plattsburgh St. | W | 64 - 60 |
| 2024-11-22 | vs | Wellesley | W | 63 - 40 |
| 2024-11-23 | @ | Westfield St. | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2024-12-06 | vs | Rensselaer | L | 65 - 73 |
| 2024-12-07 | vs | Skidmore | L | 38 - 63 |
| 2025-01-04 | @ | Hamilton | L | 59 - 75 |
| 2025-01-06 | @ | Clarkson | W | 58 - 39 |
| 2025-01-10 | vs | Vassar | L | 60 - 66 |
| 2025-01-11 | vs | Bard | W | 64 - 34 |
| 2025-01-17 | @ | Union (NY) | W | 59 - 47 |
| 2025-01-18 | @ | Ithaca | L | 59 - 79 |
| 2025-01-24 | @ | William Smith | W | 64 - 46 |
| 2025-01-25 | @ | RIT | L | 60 - 68 |
| 2025-01-28 | vs | Middlebury | W | 62 - 52 |
| 2025-01-31 | @ | Bard | W | 68 - 35 |
| 2025-02-01 | @ | Vassar | L | 58 - 77 |
| 2025-02-07 | vs | RIT | W | 55 - 52 |
| 2025-02-08 | vs | William Smith | W | 81 - 59 |
| 2025-02-14 | vs | Ithaca | L | 65 - 77 |
| 2025-02-15 | vs | Union (NY) | W | 59 - 56 |
| 2025-02-21 | @ | Skidmore | L | 55 - 61 |
| 2025-02-22 | @ | Rensselaer | W | 62 - 40 |
| 2025-02-25 | @ | RIT | L | 68 - 78 |
2025 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Flynn | - | 26 | 27.7 | 11.7 | 10.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 10.9 | 12.1 | -10 | -0.4 | -0.4 | 35.2 | 45.5 | 85.3 | -0.28 | 45.6 | 37.0 |
| Jackie Malley | - | 26 | 23.7 | 10.5 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 10.5 | 3.2 | 33 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 30.0 | 31.0 | 82.5 | 0.34 | 45.6 | 40.7 |
| Caelan Mcharney | - | 2 | 18.5 | 8.0 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.5 | 14.0 | 18 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 30.8 | 25.0 | 87.5 | 0.09 | 48.4 | 34.6 |
| Mason Baker-schlendering | - | 1 | 23.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 23 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.09 | 43.6 | 50.0 |
| Norah Niesz | - | 26 | 22.8 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 6.7 | 2.7 | -5 | -0.2 | -0.2 | 36.0 | 28.9 | 70.0 | -0.14 | 43.2 | 42.3 |
| Mason Baker-schlende | - | 1 | 16.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Annie Perry | - | 26 | 18.2 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 16 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 30.9 | 22.4 | 76.9 | 0.08 | 39.0 | 37.2 |
| Desiree Dubois | - | 2 | 14.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | -7 | -0.2 | -0.6 | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.24 | 43.6 | 33.3 |
| Kj Greenhalgh | - | 2 | 15.5 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 58.0 | 50.0 |
| Molly Keaveney | - | 25 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 0.3 | -3 | -0.2 | -0.8 | 30.9 | 25.8 | 25.0 | -0.04 | 37.9 | 38.2 |
| Nicole Jeffrey | - | 23 | 9.3 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 12 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 36.6 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.35 | 38.5 | 36.6 |
| Hannah van Dyke | - | 2 | 13.5 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 18 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 10.0 | 14.3 | 0 | 0.12 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Izzy Caron | - | 24 | 4.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.5 | -25 | -0.9 | -2.7 | 26.3 | 30.8 | 71.4 | -0.36 | 38.5 | 31.6 |
| Margaret Dougher | - | 25 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.9 | -0.6 | 38 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 17.0 | 14.3 | 50.0 | 0.4 | 22.6 | 21.3 |
| Alexis Mackenzie | - | 25 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 16 | 0.8 | 8.8 | 33.3 | 16.7 | 71.4 | 0.1 | 44.2 | 36.7 |
| Josie Cancro | - | 22 | 6.2 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 17.9 | 15.4 | 0.0 | -0.08 | 20.8 | 21.4 |
| Emily Wendt | - | 25 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | -0.4 | -5 | -0.3 | -2.7 | 16.0 | 22.2 | 50.0 | -0.2 | 22.4 | 20.0 |
| Lacey Eckert | - | 13 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 43.4 | 25.0 |
| Jocelyn Ollinger | - | 19 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| Caelan Mccormack | - | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG