St. Bonaventure Bonnies
Model Outputs
2005-2006
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1016 (#190) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1081 (#145) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.5 (#178) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.606 (#137) | - |
2006 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-11-19 | vs | Cornell Big Red | W | 62 - 52 |
| 2005-11-20 | vs | UAlbany Great Danes | W | 59 - 49 |
| 2005-11-27 | @ | Saint Francis Red Flash | W | 59 - 45 |
| 2005-12-03 | vs | Cleveland State Vikings | W | 58 - 49 |
| 2005-12-06 | vs | Niagara Purple Eagles | W | 70 - 64 |
| 2005-12-10 | vs | Kent State Golden Flashes | L | 59 - 80 |
| 2005-12-17 | vs | Canisius Golden Griffins | L | 67 - 77 |
| 2005-12-19 | @ | Navy Midshipmen | W | 57 - 48 |
| 2005-12-23 | vs | Michigan Wolverines | L | 60 - 68 |
| 2005-12-28 | @ | Siena Saints | L | 47 - 72 |
| 2005-12-30 | @ | Pittsburgh Panthers | L | 55 - 68 |
| 2006-01-03 | @ | Fordham Rams | L | 40 - 56 |
| 2006-01-06 | vs | Saint Joseph's Hawks | L | 43 - 59 |
| 2006-01-08 | vs | Massachusetts Minutewomen | W | 68 - 62 |
| 2006-01-13 | @ | La Salle Explorers | L | 66 - 86 |
| 2006-01-15 | @ | Temple Owls | L | 65 - 74 |
| 2006-01-20 | vs | Fordham Rams | L | 51 - 65 |
| 2006-01-27 | vs | Xavier Musketeers | L | 67 - 76 |
| 2006-01-29 | vs | Saint Louis Billikens | W | 71 - 59 |
| 2006-02-03 | vs | Duquesne Dukes | L | 48 - 53 |
| 2006-02-05 | @ | Dayton Flyers | L | 63 - 66 |
| 2006-02-10 | @ | Charlotte 49ers | L | 39 - 73 |
| 2006-02-12 | vs | George Washington Revolutionaries | L | 41 - 62 |
| 2006-02-17 | @ | Rhode Island Rams | L | 60 - 67 |
| 2006-02-19 | @ | Massachusetts Minutewomen | L | 55 - 66 |
| 2006-02-24 | vs | Richmond Spiders | W | 75 - 72 |
| 2006-02-26 | @ | Duquesne Dukes | L | 49 - 66 |
2006 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Hampton
|
NA | 3 | 33.0 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 14.7 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 10.0 | 66.7 | - | 50.4 | 46.6 |
M. Lee
|
- | 3 | 29.0 | 11.3 | 8.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 90.9 | - | 48.8 | 40.0 |
A.J. Hawkins
|
- | 3 | 30.3 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 6.7 | 10.7 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 64.3 | - | 63.1 | 60.0 |
P. Williams
|
- | 3 | 26.7 | 9.7 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 54.2 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 56.3 | 54.2 |
P. Lottin
|
- | 3 | 21.3 | 8.3 | 6.3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 10.7 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 28.1 | 14.3 | 50.0 | - | 35.2 | 32.8 |
T. Relph
|
G | 1 | 30.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 50.8 | 42.9 |
I. Carson
|
- | 3 | 13.0 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 85.7 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 92.4 | 85.7 |
T. Diggs
|
- | 3 | 27.7 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 7.3 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 43.8 | 43.8 |
W. Dunston
|
- | 3 | 8.7 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 14.5 | 0.0 |
I. Kovacevic
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG